Jacob C. Day

463 total citations
10 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Jacob C. Day is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacob C. Day has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Gender Studies and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jacob C. Day's work include Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Jacob C. Day is often cited by papers focused on Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Jacob C. Day collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jacob C. Day's co-authors include Steve McDonald, Lisa Tichavsky, Margaret A. Zahn, Jonathan R. Brauer and H. Daniel Butler and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency and Sociological Methods & Research.

In The Last Decade

Jacob C. Day

9 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jacob C. Day United States	7	180	124	65	58	38	10	285
Dawn K. Cecil United States	10	192 1.1×	123 1.0×	69 1.1×	36 0.6×	11 0.3×	20	282
Carolette Norwood United States	8	82 0.5×	75 0.6×	45 0.7×	71 1.2×	23 0.6×	18	275
Graça Machel United States	3	160 0.9×	152 1.2×	74 1.1×	50 0.9×	14 0.4×	5	318
Frauke Peter Germany	7	107 0.6×	35 0.3×	61 0.9×	44 0.8×	54 1.4×	46	224
Ryan Kelty United States	6	94 0.5×	67 0.5×	40 0.6×	60 1.0×	43 1.1×	12	249
Karen Z. Kramer United States	12	157 0.9×	29 0.2×	67 1.0×	121 2.1×	28 0.7×	20	299
Margaret L. Usdansky United States	10	187 1.0×	42 0.3×	43 0.7×	111 1.9×	22 0.6×	13	288
Stephanie Bontrager United States	7	386 2.1×	198 1.6×	76 1.2×	22 0.4×	22 0.6×	7	421
Sarah M. Kendig United States	5	181 1.0×	55 0.4×	39 0.6×	70 1.2×	8 0.2×	6	287
Robert L. Reece United States	9	211 1.2×	39 0.3×	34 0.5×	76 1.3×	23 0.6×	16	282

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob C. Day

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob C. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob C. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob C. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob C. Day

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob C. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob C. Day. The network helps show where Jacob C. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob C. Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob C. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob C. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob C. Day. Jacob C. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Brauer, Jonathan R. & Jacob C. Day. (2025). Money in the bank: progressive problem shifts in criminological science. Theory and Society. 54(6). 1021–1055.

2.

Brauer, Jonathan R., et al.. (2019). Do Employers “Walk the Talk” After All? An Illustration of Methods for Assessing Signals in Underpowered Designs. Sociological Methods & Research. 50(4). 1801–1841. 5 indexed citations

3.

Day, Jacob C.. (2017). Climbing the ladder or getting stuck: An optimal matching analysis of racial differences in college football coaches’ job-level career patterns. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 53. 1–15. 8 indexed citations

4.

Day, Jacob C.. (2015). Transitions to the Top. Work and Occupations. 42(4). 408–446. 22 indexed citations

5.

Day, Jacob C., Margaret A. Zahn, & Lisa Tichavsky. (2014). What Works for Whom? The Effects of Gender Responsive Programming on Girls and Boys in Secure Detention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 52(1). 93–129. 41 indexed citations

6.

Day, Jacob C., Jonathan R. Brauer, & H. Daniel Butler. (2014). Coercion and Social Support Behind Bars. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 42(2). 133–155. 41 indexed citations

7.

Day, Jacob C.. (2011). The Labor Market Context of Social Capital: Race and Social Networks in the Occupational Internal Labor Market of College Football Coaches. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

8.

McDonald, Steve & Jacob C. Day. (2010). Race, Gender, and the Invisible Hand of Social Capital. Sociology Compass. 4(7). 532–543. 61 indexed citations

9.

Day, Jacob C. & Steve McDonald. (2010). NOT SO FAST, MY FRIEND: SOCIAL CAPITAL AND THE RACE DISPARITY IN PROMOTIONS AMONG COLLEGE FOOTBALL COACHES. Sociological Spectrum. 30(2). 138–158. 31 indexed citations

10.

Zahn, Margaret A., et al.. (2009). Determining What Works for Girls in the Juvenile Justice System. Crime & Delinquency. 55(2). 266–293. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact