Jack W. Scannell
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian WarringtonThomas P. CurtisWilliam T. SloanMalcolm P. YoungClaus C. HilgetagGully BurnsJim BosleyMark A. O’Neill
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Jack W. Scannell
28 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Ecology 539
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 483
- Economics and Econometrics 315
Countries citing papers authored by Jack W. Scannell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack W. Scannell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack W. Scannell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack W. Scannell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack W. Scannell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack W. Scannell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack W. Scannell. The network helps show where Jack W. Scannell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack W. Scannell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack W. Scannell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack W. Scannell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack W. Scannell. Jack W. Scannell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 180 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiencybreakdown → | 1264 |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limitsbreakdown → | 773 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 279 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | The Analysis of Cortical Connectivity | 66 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 80 |
About Jack W. Scannell
Jack W. Scannell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (483 citations) and Ecology (539 citations). Jack W. Scannell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian Warrington, Thomas P. Curtis, William T. Sloan, Malcolm P. Young, Claus C. Hilgetag, Gully Burns, Jim Bosley, Mark A. O’Neill, M. P. Young and Colin Blakemore. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.