Jack Pilgrim

4.4k total citations
18 papers, 167 citations indexed

About

Jack Pilgrim is a scholar working on Insect Science, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jack Pilgrim has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 167 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Insect Science, 6 papers in Infectious Diseases and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jack Pilgrim's work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (8 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers). Jack Pilgrim is often cited by papers focused on Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (8 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers). Jack Pilgrim collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and South Africa. Jack Pilgrim's co-authors include Gregory D. D. Hurst, Stefanos Siozios, Matthew Baylis, Dharmi Kapadia, Helen Brooks, David Reeves, Ivaylo Vassilev, Anne Rogers, Claire Garros and Helen Davison and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Emerging infectious diseases.

In The Last Decade

Jack Pilgrim

16 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers

Jack Pilgrim
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Insect Science 78
  • Genetics 39
  • Plant Science 26
  • Infectious Diseases 23
  • Parasitology 22
Replace Elizabeth A. Opiyo with:
Elizabeth A. Opiyo Uganda
Anneloes van den Broek Netherlands
Hsiu‐Hua Pai Taiwan
Alex Schwartz Denmark
Jérémi Rouamba Burkina Faso
Antoine M. G. Barreaux United Kingdom
Yeromin P. Mlacha Tanzania
Carlos Fernando Salgueirosa de Andrade Brazil
Jennifer R. Schneider United States
Ronald López United States
Elizabeth A. Opiyo Uganda View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jack Pilgrim
Jack Pilgrim · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jack Pilgrim
Jack Pilgrim · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Pilgrim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Pilgrim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Pilgrim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Pilgrim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Pilgrim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Pilgrim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Pilgrim. The network helps show where Jack Pilgrim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Pilgrim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Pilgrim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Pilgrim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Pilgrim. Jack Pilgrim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 0
4 2
5 2
6 1
7 2
8 27
9 3
10 6
11 27
12 1
13 5
14 9
15 32
16
Creature comforts: Social networks, pets and the work associated with the management of long-term illness in the UK
1
17 46
18
Hospital social work: cui bono?
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026