Jack Paine
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Demography top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Development top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anne MengPeter LorentzenM. Taylor FravelAlexander LeeRobert PowellGretchen HelmkeDavid A. LakeAndrew T. Little
- Topics
- Political Conflict and Governance (17 papers)Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (10 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceInternational Organization
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Jack Paine
26 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Sociology and Political Science 243
- Political Science and International Relations 149
- Demography 75
- Economics and Econometrics 48
- Development 37
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Paine
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Paine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Paine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Paine. The network helps show where Jack Paine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Paine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Paine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Paine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Paine. Jack Paine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | Set-Theoretic Comparative Methods: Less Distinctive Than Claimed | 3 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Jack Paine
Jack Paine is a scholar working on Demography, Development and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (17 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (10 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (37 citations), Political Science and International Relations (149 citations) and Demography (75 citations). Jack Paine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Anne Meng, Peter Lorentzen, M. Taylor Fravel, Alexander Lee, Robert Powell, Gretchen Helmke, David A. Lake, Andrew T. Little, James D. Fearon and Jutta Bolt. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and International Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.