Jack Maze

838 citations
77 papers · 634 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Maze

76 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Jack Maze
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 199
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 281
  • Plant Science 277
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Forestry 15
Replace Georges Cremers with:
Georges Cremers France
Josephine M. Ward New Zealand
L. A. S. Johnson Australia
Gillian M. Puttick United States
A. V. Hall South Africa
Maurici Mus Spain
Alexis A. Ducousso France
Santiago Espinel Spain
Uzi Plitmann Israel
Branka Tucić Serbia
Jack Maze relative to Georges Cremers France Georges Cremers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Georges Cremers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Maze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Maze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Maze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Maze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Maze. The network helps show where Jack Maze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Maze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Maze Line = papers co-authored together Jack Maze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200912
2 20041
3 20032
4 20014
5 20003
6 19971
7 199628
8
VARIATION AND INTEGRATION IN RARE GRASS ACHNATHERUM HENDERSONII: PHENOTYPIC COMPERISON WITH PARAPATRIC COMMON CONGENERS
19941
9 19933
10
A multivariate analysis of the trichomes of Hedera L.
198911
11 19883
12 19879
13 198414
14 198413
15 19826
16 19824
17 198122
18 197911
19 197413
20 196825

About Jack Maze

Jack Maze is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 77 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (28 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (13 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (13 papers), Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (11 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (199 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (281 citations), Plant Science (277 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations) and Forestry (15 citations). Jack Maze has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary E. Bradfield, William H. Parker, Peter R. Sibbald, Bruce A. Bohm, Nancy G. Dengler, Nina Vogt, Kedi Yang, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby, Roy Turkington and Gillian L. Rapson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, International Journal of Plant Sciences, Taxon, Biosystems and Phytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026