Jack Lacy

19 total papers · 1.3k total citations
14 papers, 735 citations indexed

About

Jack Lacy is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jack Lacy has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 735 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Information Systems, 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jack Lacy's work include Digital Rights Management and Security (6 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (4 papers) and Copyright and Intellectual Property (3 papers). Jack Lacy is often cited by papers focused on Digital Rights Management and Security (6 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (4 papers) and Copyright and Intellectual Property (3 papers). Jack Lacy collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Jack Lacy's co-authors include Matt Blaze, Joan Feigenbaum, Sandra A. Mitchell, Amy R. Reibman, Schuyler Quackenbush, Yixin Kang, Julie Byrne, Martin Rösner, T. Shamoon and Knox Carey and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the IEEE, Optics Express and Electronics Letters.

In The Last Decade

Jack Lacy

14 papers receiving 688 citations

Hit Papers

Decentralized trust manag... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Jack Lacy 397 337 333 303 91 14 735
W. T. Luke Teacy 420 1.1× 274 0.8× 507 1.5× 285 0.9× 56 0.6× 23 863
David Zage 261 0.7× 272 0.8× 333 1.0× 484 1.6× 29 0.3× 25 771
Cihan Kaleli 115 0.3× 661 2.0× 453 1.4× 123 0.4× 177 1.9× 29 845
Ramanathan Narayanan 108 0.3× 216 0.6× 464 1.4× 174 0.6× 30 0.3× 20 808
Haifeng Liu 118 0.3× 575 1.7× 351 1.1× 125 0.4× 259 2.8× 32 829
Debanjan Saha 159 0.4× 216 0.6× 190 0.6× 595 2.0× 43 0.5× 44 883
Kevin Hoffman 248 0.6× 290 0.9× 381 1.1× 289 1.0× 15 0.2× 22 680
Jesús Bernal 108 0.3× 590 1.8× 215 0.6× 100 0.3× 223 2.5× 6 673
Steven Englehardt 449 1.1× 463 1.4× 465 1.4× 90 0.3× 37 0.4× 13 825
Souptik Datta 136 0.3× 158 0.5× 647 1.9× 262 0.9× 76 0.8× 12 855

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lacy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lacy. The network helps show where Jack Lacy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Lacy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Lacy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Lacy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Lacy. Jack Lacy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026