Jack Amariglio

567 citations
22 papers · 245 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Amariglio

15 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

Jack Amariglio
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 170
  • Finance 31
  • Public Administration 8
  • Economics and Econometrics 64
Replace Chris Harman with:
Chris Harman
Constantine George Caffentzis United States
Allen J. Matusow United States
Yahya M. Madra United States
Rajat Kanta Ray India
Mario Telò Belgium
Carl Wennerlind United States
George Konrád
Kenneth McNaught Canada
Andrew Rothstein United States
Jack Amariglio relative to Chris Harman Chris Harman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Chris Harman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Amariglio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Amariglio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Amariglio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Amariglio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Amariglio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Amariglio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Amariglio. The network helps show where Jack Amariglio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jack Amariglio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Amariglio Line = papers co-authored together Jack Amariglio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198974
2 198850
3 199431
4 199026
5 198914
6
ECONOMIC HISTORY AND THE THEORY OF PRIMITIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
198411
7 20106
8 19916
9 20066
10 20026
11 20183
12 19913
13 20193
14 20082
15 20091
16 20071
17 20001
18 20081
19 20160
20 20160

About Jack Amariglio

Jack Amariglio is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Public Administration, having authored 22 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (12 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (8 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (39 citations), Sociology and Political Science (170 citations), Finance (31 citations), Public Administration (8 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (64 citations). Jack Amariglio has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Callari, David F. Ruccio, Stephen Resnick, Richard Wolff, Stephen Cullenberg, Julie Graham, Robin D. G. Kelley, Yahya M. Madra, Fredric Jameson and Richard D. Wolff. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, Rethinking Marxism, Cambridge Journal of Economics, History and Theory and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact