J.A.C. Verkouteren

427 total citations
8 papers, 238 citations indexed

About

J.A.C. Verkouteren is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.A.C. Verkouteren has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 238 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Dermatology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J.A.C. Verkouteren's work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (6 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (4 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers). J.A.C. Verkouteren is often cited by papers focused on Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (6 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (4 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers). J.A.C. Verkouteren collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. J.A.C. Verkouteren's co-authors include Tamar Nijsten, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Albert Hofman, Albert Hofman, Enes Hajdarbegovic, André G. Uitterlinden, Henk M. Blom, Loes M. Hollestein, Daniel Levy and Constance Turman and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and British Journal of Dermatology.

In The Last Decade

J.A.C. Verkouteren

8 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.A.C. Verkouteren Netherlands	6	178	146	86	86	13	8	238
Fatima Birch‐Johansen Denmark	6	236 1.3×	216 1.5×	48 0.6×	213 2.5×	13 1.0×	8	353
Enrico Zelin Italy	8	90 0.5×	72 0.5×	41 0.5×	52 0.6×	11 0.8×	26	178
Gregory M. Bricca United States	4	220 1.2×	115 0.8×	72 0.8×	206 2.4×	4 0.3×	5	291
Marcia Davis Australia	9	188 1.1×	196 1.3×	85 1.0×	229 2.7×	6 0.5×	10	404
K. DeAmbrosis Australia	5	221 1.2×	190 1.3×	36 0.4×	177 2.1×	6 0.5×	6	267
F. Herms France	9	162 0.9×	122 0.8×	105 1.2×	83 1.0×	14 1.1×	25	250
Hermina C. Wisgerhof Netherlands	7	193 1.1×	113 0.8×	46 0.5×	192 2.2×	6 0.5×	8	292
Enrique Rodríguez‐Lomba Spain	8	82 0.5×	70 0.5×	28 0.3×	119 1.4×	18 1.4×	39	196
Carlos Guillén Barona Spain	7	205 1.2×	161 1.1×	54 0.6×	107 1.2×	9 0.7×	21	262
Simone Cappilli Italy	9	99 0.6×	112 0.8×	25 0.3×	97 1.1×	18 1.4×	32	207

Countries citing papers authored by J.A.C. Verkouteren

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.A.C. Verkouteren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A.C. Verkouteren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A.C. Verkouteren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.A.C. Verkouteren

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A.C. Verkouteren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A.C. Verkouteren. The network helps show where J.A.C. Verkouteren may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.A.C. Verkouteren

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.A.C. Verkouteren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.A.C. Verkouteren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.A.C. Verkouteren. J.A.C. Verkouteren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Verkouteren, J.A.C., Luba M. Pardo, André G. Uitterlinden, & Tamar Nijsten. (2018). Non‐genetic and genetic predictors of a superficial first basal cell carcinoma. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 33(3). 533–540. 2 indexed citations

2.

Verkouteren, J.A.C., et al.. (2017). Occurrence of metachronous basal cell carcinomas: a prognostic model. British Journal of Dermatology. 177(4). 1113–1121. 5 indexed citations

3.

Verkouteren, J.A.C., et al.. (2017). Epidemiology of basal cell carcinoma: scholarly review. British Journal of Dermatology. 177(2). 359–372. 174 indexed citations

4.

Pardo, Luba M., Wenqing Li, Shih-Jen Hwang, et al.. (2017). Genome-Wide Association Studies of Multiple Keratinocyte Cancers. PLoS ONE. 12(1). e0169873–e0169873. 9 indexed citations

5.

Zhong, Kaiyin, J.A.C. Verkouteren, Leonie C. Jacobs, et al.. (2016). Pigmentation-Independent Susceptibility Loci for Actinic Keratosis Highlighted by Compound Heterozygosity Analysis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 137(1). 77–84. 10 indexed citations

6.

Hajdarbegovic, Enes, Henk M. Blom, J.A.C. Verkouteren, et al.. (2016). Atopic dermatitis is not associated with actinic keratosis: cross‐sectional results from the Rotterdam study. British Journal of Dermatology. 175(1). 89–94. 10 indexed citations

7.

Verkouteren, J.A.C., et al.. (2015). Predicting the Risk of a Second Basal Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 135(11). 2649–2656. 26 indexed citations

8.

Hajdarbegovic, Enes, J.A.C. Verkouteren, & Deepak Balak. (2012). Non-melanoma skin cancer: The hygiene hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses. 79(6). 872–874. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact