J.A. Pike
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 7
- Oncology 6
- Lung Cancer Research Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Paul Hoskins (9 shared papers)Kenneth D. Swenerton (6 shared papers)Peter Lim (2 shared papers)Michael S. Anglesio (1 shared paper)Amy Lum (1 shared paper)Janine Senz (1 shared paper)Anthony N. Karnezis (1 shared paper)Samuel Leung (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (4 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (2 papers)Cancer (1 paper)Annals of Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
J.A. Pike
11 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 783
- Reproductive Medicine 607
- Oncology 306
- Cancer Research 160
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 168
Countries citing papers authored by J.A. Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of J.A. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A. Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.A. Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A. Pike. The network helps show where J.A. Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.A. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 631 |
| 2 | 2001 | 213 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 133 | |
| 4 | The role of the fallopian tube in ovarian cancer. | 2012 | 67 |
| 5 | 1995 | 51 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 1 |
About J.A. Pike
J.A. Pike is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (1 paper) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (783 citations), Reproductive Medicine (607 citations), Oncology (306 citations), Cancer Research (160 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (168 citations). J.A. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Hoskins, Kenneth D. Swenerton, Peter Lim, Michael S. Anglesio, Amy Lum, Janine Senz, Anthony N. Karnezis, Samuel Leung, Jessica N. McAlpine and Winnie Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancer and Annals of Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.