Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Revised global model of thermosphere winds using satellite and ground‐based observations
1991553 citationsManfred A. Biondi, T. L. Killeen et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
An update to the Horizontal Wind Model (HWM): The quiet time thermosphere
2015510 citationsJ. W. Meriwether, J. J. Makela et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Meriwether
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Meriwether's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Meriwether with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Meriwether more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Meriwether
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Meriwether. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Meriwether. The network helps show where J. W. Meriwether may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Meriwether
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Meriwether.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Meriwether based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Meriwether. J. W. Meriwether is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wu, Qian, et al.. (2009). Ionosphere Mesosphere Polar Aeronomy Campaign (IMPAC). AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.
8.
Gerrard, A. J., et al.. (2009). Comparisons of neutral thermospheric winds as measured by SOFDI and the Millstone Hill Incoherent Scatter Radar. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2009.1 indexed citations
9.
Meriwether, J. W., et al.. (2006). Measuring thermospheric winds and temperatures with a tri-static Fabry-Perot interferometer network in Alaska. AGUFM. 2006.1 indexed citations
Fesen, C. G., D. L. Hysell, J. W. Meriwether, et al.. (2001). Modeling the low latitude thermosphere and ionosphere. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.1 indexed citations
12.
Meriwether, J. W., et al.. (2001). Analysis of an Temperature Inversion Event in the Lower Mesosphere. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.3 indexed citations
Biondi, Manfred A., et al.. (1990). Thermospheric neutral winds at low latitudes during the September-October 1986 Sundial campaign - Optical interferometer results. Annales Geophysicae. 8. 409–417.3 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Roger W., et al.. (1989). Mapping the Wind in the Polar Thermosphere: A Case Study within the CEDAR Program. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).2 indexed citations
19.
Meriwether, J. W., et al.. (1987). On the nighttime signatures of thermospheric winds observed at Sondrestrom, Greenland, as correlated with interplanetary magnetic field parameters. Annales Geophysicae. 5. 329–336.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.