J. W. Burby
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Hong QinAlain J. BrizardRonald C. DavidsonQi TangPrasanna BalaprakashRomit MaulikMichael D. GrahamYao Zhou
- Topics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers)Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (9 papers)Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. W. Burby
38 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 148
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 96
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 81
- Numerical Analysis 49
- Computational Mechanics 48
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Burby
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Burby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Burby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Burby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Burby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Burby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Burby. The network helps show where J. W. Burby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Burby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Burby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Burby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Burby. J. W. Burby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Chasing Hamiltonian structure in gyrokinetic theory | 3 |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Measurements and modeling of prompt loss of neutral beam ions from NSTX | 1 |
About J. W. Burby
J. W. Burby is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 40 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (9 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (148 citations), Numerical Analysis (49 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (96 citations). J. W. Burby has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hong Qin, Alain J. Brizard, Ronald C. Davidson, Qi Tang, Prasanna Balaprakash, Romit Maulik, Michael D. Graham, Yao Zhou, A. Bhattacharjee and P.J. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Scientific Reports and Journal of Computational Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.