J. Vine
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Toxicology top 10%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals 5
-
- Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection 3
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 3
- Co-authors
- M. G. Mullins (4 shared papers)T. R. Watson (6 shared papers)Kanniah Rajasekaran (1 shared paper)Michael J. Dawson (3 shared papers)Peter Brooks (2 shared papers)Paul Wynne (4 shared papers)Philip J. Marriott (1 shared paper)Roger L. Nation (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Xenobiotica (5 papers)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (3 papers)Journal of Chromatography B (2 papers)European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2 papers)Journal of Chromatography A (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaArmeniaUnited States
In The Last Decade
J. Vine
31 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Spectroscopy 154
- Toxicology 31
- Analytical Chemistry 75
- Equine 11
- Pharmacology 41
Countries citing papers authored by J. Vine
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Vine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Vine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Vine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Vine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Vine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Vine. The network helps show where J. Vine may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Vine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 57 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 6 |
About J. Vine
J. Vine is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Pharmacology, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (5 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (154 citations), Toxicology (31 citations), Analytical Chemistry (75 citations), Equine (11 citations) and Pharmacology (41 citations). J. Vine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Armenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. G. Mullins, T. R. Watson, Kanniah Rajasekaran, Michael J. Dawson, Peter Brooks, Paul Wynne, Philip J. Marriott, Roger L. Nation, E. J. Triggs and Brian M. Learoyd. Their work appears in journals such as Xenobiotica, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Journal of Chromatography B, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Journal of Chromatography A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.