J. Thadeus Meeks

699 total citations
19 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

J. Thadeus Meeks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Thadeus Meeks has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in J. Thadeus Meeks's work include Cognitive Functions and Memory (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). J. Thadeus Meeks is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Functions and Memory (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). J. Thadeus Meeks collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Thadeus Meeks's co-authors include Richard L. Marsh, Gene A. Brewer, Jason L. Hicks, Gabriel I. Cook, Justin B. Knight, W. Keith Campbell, Joshua D. Miller, Chad E. Lakey, Diana L. Young and Nash Unsworth and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Memory and Language and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

J. Thadeus Meeks

19 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Thadeus Meeks United States 12 343 342 139 63 63 19 491
Agnieszka Niedźwieńska Poland 13 368 1.1× 303 0.9× 169 1.2× 58 0.9× 29 0.5× 40 573
Thomas Hancock United States 7 216 0.6× 194 0.6× 82 0.6× 54 0.9× 62 1.0× 8 291
Emily R. Waldum United States 11 226 0.7× 255 0.7× 162 1.2× 45 0.7× 12 0.2× 11 362
MA Conway United Kingdom 6 197 0.6× 144 0.4× 61 0.4× 9 0.1× 30 0.5× 8 317
Katharina M. Schnitzspahn Switzerland 18 451 1.3× 833 2.4× 651 4.7× 204 3.2× 22 0.3× 37 950
Bridget A. Smeekens United States 11 605 1.8× 436 1.3× 43 0.3× 7 0.1× 48 0.8× 16 692
Anna-Lisa Cohen United States 6 217 0.6× 249 0.7× 118 0.8× 35 0.6× 51 0.8× 8 377
Elizabeth S. Stevens United States 13 236 0.7× 88 0.3× 76 0.5× 6 0.1× 24 0.4× 34 432
Celinda Reese‐Melancon United States 11 138 0.4× 147 0.4× 132 0.9× 33 0.5× 8 0.1× 24 298
Jennifer E. Breneiser United States 6 487 1.4× 686 2.0× 392 2.8× 154 2.4× 23 0.4× 14 751

Countries citing papers authored by J. Thadeus Meeks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Thadeus Meeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Thadeus Meeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Thadeus Meeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Thadeus Meeks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Thadeus Meeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Thadeus Meeks. The network helps show where J. Thadeus Meeks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Thadeus Meeks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Thadeus Meeks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Thadeus Meeks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Thadeus Meeks. J. Thadeus Meeks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Meeks, J. Thadeus, et al.. (2019). Negative Mood Reduces Negative False Memories After a Brief Mindfulness Exercise. Mindfulness. 10(12). 2507–2521. 6 indexed citations
2.
Meeks, J. Thadeus, et al.. (2015). The Compensatory Role of Implementation Intentions for Young Adults with Low Working Memory Capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 29(5). 691–701. 9 indexed citations
3.
Meeks, J. Thadeus, Justin B. Knight, Gene A. Brewer, Gabriel I. Cook, & Richard L. Marsh. (2014). Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect. Consciousness and Cognition. 24. 57–69. 5 indexed citations
4.
Meeks, J. Thadeus, et al.. (2014). Does Sex Matter? The Moderating Role of Sex on the Relationship Between Stress Biomarkers and Cognition. Current Psychology. 33(2). 199–218. 4 indexed citations
5.
Cook, Gabriel I., et al.. (2013). The Role of Interruptions and Contextual Associations in Delayed‐Execute Prospective Memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28(1). 91–103. 9 indexed citations
6.
Pomerantz, Andrew M., et al.. (2013). Should psychotherapists disclose their own psychological problems?. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 14(4). 249–255. 11 indexed citations
7.
Ball, B. Hunter, Richard L. Marsh, J. Thadeus Meeks, & Jason L. Hicks. (2011). The reactivation of associated information affects source monitoring. Memory & Cognition. 39(5). 818–826. 3 indexed citations
8.
Brewer, Gene A., Justin B. Knight, J. Thadeus Meeks, & Richard L. Marsh. (2011). On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition. 20(3). 901–907. 33 indexed citations
9.
Knight, Justin B., J. Thadeus Meeks, Richard L. Marsh, et al.. (2011). An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(2). 298–307. 44 indexed citations
10.
Brewer, Gene A., et al.. (2010). Noncriterial Recollection Influences Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63(10). 1936–1942. 28 indexed citations
11.
Brewer, Gene A., et al.. (2010). The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory. Memory. 18(4). 385–393. 36 indexed citations
12.
Brewer, Gene A., et al.. (2010). A comparison of activity-based to event-based prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25(4). 632–640. 18 indexed citations
13.
Meeks, J. Thadeus & Richard L. Marsh. (2009). Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks. Psychological Research. 74(1). 82–89. 56 indexed citations
14.
Marsh, Richard L., et al.. (2009). Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a subsequent test. Journal of Memory and Language. 61(3). 470–479. 26 indexed citations
15.
Unsworth, Nash, Joshua D. Miller, Chad E. Lakey, et al.. (2009). Exploring the Relations Among Executive Functions, Fluid Intelligence, and Personality. Journal of Individual Differences. 30(4). 194–200. 89 indexed citations
16.
Brewer, Gene A., et al.. (2009). The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection. The American Journal of Psychology. 122(1). 89–97. 23 indexed citations
17.
Marsh, Richard L., et al.. (2007). Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel. Memory & Cognition. 35(6). 1197–1204. 12 indexed citations
18.
Cook, Gabriel I., et al.. (2007). Learning is impaired by activated intentions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(1). 101–106. 15 indexed citations
19.
Meeks, J. Thadeus, Jason L. Hicks, & Richard L. Marsh. (2006). Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition. 16(4). 997–1004. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026