J. S. Shipman

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
25 papers, 950 citations indexed

About

J. S. Shipman is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Applied Mathematics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. S. Shipman has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 950 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Numerical Analysis, 7 papers in Applied Mathematics and 4 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. S. Shipman's work include Numerical methods for differential equations (11 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (7 papers) and Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (6 papers). J. S. Shipman is often cited by papers focused on Numerical methods for differential equations (11 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (7 papers) and Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (6 papers). J. S. Shipman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. J. S. Shipman's co-authors include S. M. Roberts, Mark D. Pritt, L. F. Shampine, William J. Ellis and Alan Andrew and has published in prestigious journals such as Technometrics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and Journal of Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

J. S. Shipman

24 papers receiving 842 citations

Hit Papers

Two-Point Boundary Value Problems: Shooting Methods 1973 2026 1990 2008 1973 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. S. Shipman United States 12 312 209 168 161 114 25 950
P. M. Prenter United States 11 331 1.1× 38 0.2× 284 1.7× 77 0.5× 241 2.1× 25 1.1k
E. N. Nilson United States 12 247 0.8× 89 0.4× 443 2.6× 84 0.5× 72 0.6× 20 866
S. M. Roberts United States 15 440 1.4× 88 0.4× 192 1.1× 17 0.1× 111 1.0× 45 931
I.G. Nidekker 6 222 0.7× 39 0.2× 85 0.5× 26 0.2× 128 1.1× 7 780
Richard C. Roberts United Kingdom 7 107 0.3× 69 0.3× 165 1.0× 26 0.2× 223 2.0× 11 919
IH Parker United Kingdom 5 195 0.6× 44 0.2× 94 0.6× 19 0.1× 141 1.2× 5 692
Preston C. Hammer United States 17 348 1.1× 72 0.3× 343 2.0× 32 0.2× 215 1.9× 56 1.3k
A. V. Balakrishnan 2 182 0.6× 50 0.2× 137 0.8× 36 0.2× 95 0.8× 2 1.1k
W. S. Loud United States 13 143 0.5× 63 0.3× 107 0.6× 21 0.1× 113 1.0× 31 952
Eugene L. Wachspress United States 16 358 1.1× 135 0.6× 720 4.3× 67 0.4× 312 2.7× 44 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by J. S. Shipman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. S. Shipman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. S. Shipman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. S. Shipman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. S. Shipman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. S. Shipman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. S. Shipman. The network helps show where J. S. Shipman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. S. Shipman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. S. Shipman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. S. Shipman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. S. Shipman. J. S. Shipman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pritt, Mark D. & J. S. Shipman. (1994). Least-squares two-dimensional phase unwrapping using FFT's. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 32(3). 706–708. 237 indexed citations
2.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1979). Fundamental matrix and two-point boundary-value problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 28(1). 77–88. 21 indexed citations
3.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1978). A new derivation of the Scott formulation of invariant imbedding. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 64(2). 480–487. 5 indexed citations
4.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1976). On the closed form solution of Troesch's problem. Journal of Computational Physics. 21(3). 291–304. 76 indexed citations
5.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1976). Computation of the flow between a rotating and a stationary disk. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 73(1). 53–63. 30 indexed citations
6.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1974). The extended continuation method and invariant imbedding. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 45(1). 32–42. 1 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1974). An iteration perturbation technique. Journal of Computational Physics. 16(3). 285–297. 1 indexed citations
8.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1973). The epsilon variation method in two-point boundary-value problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 12(2). 136–151. 6 indexed citations
9.
Shampine, L. F., S. M. Roberts, & J. S. Shipman. (1973). Two-Point Boundary Value Problems: Shooting Methods. Mathematics of Computation. 27(121). 213–213. 347 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1973). Extension of a perturbation technique for nonlinear two-point boundary-value problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 12(5). 459–470. 1 indexed citations
11.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1972). Solution of Troesch's two-point boundary value problem by a combination of techniques. Journal of Computational Physics. 10(2). 232–241. 42 indexed citations
12.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1971). Multipoint solution of two-point boundary-value problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 7(4). 301–318. 34 indexed citations
13.
Roberts, S. M., J. S. Shipman, & William J. Ellis. (1969). A Perturbation Technique for Nonlinear Two-Point Boundary Value Problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 6(3). 347–358. 15 indexed citations
14.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1968). Justification for the continuation method in two-point boundary value problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 21(1). 23–30. 14 indexed citations
15.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1968). The methods of adjoints and complementary functions in two-point boundary value problems. International Journal of Computer Mathematics. 2(1-4). 269–277. 3 indexed citations
16.
Roberts, S. M., et al.. (1968). Continuation in quasilinearization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 2(3). 164–178. 16 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, S. M. & J. S. Shipman. (1967). Continuation in shooting methods for two-point boundary value problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 18(1). 45–58. 59 indexed citations
18.
Shipman, J. S., et al.. (1955). TABLES OF BENNETT FUNCTIONS FOR THE TWO-FREQUENCY MODULATION PRODUCT PROBLEM FOR THE HALF-WAVE SQUARE-LAW RECTIFIER. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. 8(4). 457–467. 8 indexed citations
19.
Shipman, J. S.. (1955). On Middleton’s paper “Some general results in the theory of noise through non-linear devices”. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 13(2). 200–201. 4 indexed citations
20.
Shipman, J. S., et al.. (1954). TABLES OF BENNETT FUNCTIONS FOR THE TWO-FREQUENCY MODULATION PRODUCT PROBLEM FOR THE HALF-WAVE LINEAR RECTIFIER. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. 7(4). 505–509. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026