J. S. Clayton
- Ecology top 5%
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Deborah HofstraP. D. ChampionChris C. TannerD. J. BagyarajGiuseppe BrunduLars AndersonAndreas HussnerElisabeth S. Bakker
- Topics
- Biological Control of Invasive Species (18 papers)Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (17 papers)Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandItalyBelgium
In The Last Decade
J. S. Clayton
48 papers receiving 848 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ecology 496
- Environmental Chemistry 444
- Insect Science 262
- Plant Science 241
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 205
Countries citing papers authored by J. S. Clayton
This map shows the geographic impact of J. S. Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. S. Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. S. Clayton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. S. Clayton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. S. Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. S. Clayton. The network helps show where J. S. Clayton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. S. Clayton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. S. Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. S. Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. S. Clayton. J. S. Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mosquito control by electrostatic spray application | 2 |
| 2 | Rapid Screening of Multiple Compounds for Control of the Invasive Diatom Didymosphenia geminata | 5 |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | Border control for potential aquatic weeds: Stage 3. Weed risk management. | 10 |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | Border control for potential aquatic weeds. Stage 1. Weed risk model. | 35 |
| 10 | Distribution and density of vegetative hydrilla propagules in the sediments of two New Zealand lakes. | 9 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About J. S. Clayton
J. S. Clayton is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Insect Science and Ecology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biological Control of Invasive Species (18 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (17 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (444 citations), Insect Science (262 citations) and Ecology (496 citations). J. S. Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Hofstra, P. D. Champion, Chris C. Tanner, D. J. Bagyaraj, Giuseppe Brundu, Lars Anderson, Andreas Hussner, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Iris Stiers and Michiel J. J. M. Verhofstad. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrobiologia, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and Aquatic Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.