J. Rush Pierce

1.8k citations
66 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. Rush Pierce

64 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

J. Rush Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • General Health Professions 193
  • Health 63
  • Emergency Medical Services 52
  • Epidemiology 251
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
Replace George Berry with:
George Berry United States
Lee Youkeles United States
B. Dervaux France
Cameron Hurst Australia
Guohai Zhou United States
Khabir Ahmad Pakistan
Jay P. Siegel United States
Chris Patterson United Kingdom
Elmer Villanueva Australia
Trina Hosmer United States
J. Rush Pierce relative to George Berry United States George Berry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
George Berry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Rush Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Rush Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Rush Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Rush Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Rush Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Rush Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Rush Pierce. The network helps show where J. Rush Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Rush Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Rush Pierce Line = papers co-authored together J. Rush Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2 20134
3 20121
4 201112
5 201067
6 200915
7 20092
8 200820
9 200855
10 20078
11 200713
12 2007212
13 200617
14 200417
15
"In the interest of humanity and the cause of science": the yellow fever volunteers.
20034
16 20034
17
The preceptor as ethics educator.
19992
18
Constructing Memory: The Vimy Memorial
19925
19 199210
20 197930

About J. Rush Pierce

J. Rush Pierce is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Medical Laboratory Technology and Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (193 citations), Health (63 citations), Emergency Medical Services (52 citations), Epidemiology (251 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations). J. Rush Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Charles F. Earhart, W. Ross Ashby, James E. Rohrer, Robert Langberg, William Henderson, David Spencer, Gerald B. Merenstein, Joseph A. Berry, Yehouda Marcus and J. Thomas Stocker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, American Journal of Public Health, Physics Today and American Journal of Infection Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026