J. Roberts

87.0k total citations
17 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

J. Roberts is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Roberts has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 8 papers in Radiation and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Roberts's work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (7 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers). J. Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (7 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers). J. Roberts collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. J. Roberts's co-authors include B. E. Bonner, Stefan Pokorski, G. Eppley, Jasper Hasenkamp, R. M. Lynden‐Bell, T. Nussbaum, Laura Covi, E.D. Platner, W. J. Llope and J. Lamas-Valverde and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Molecular Physics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

J. Roberts

16 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Roberts United States 10 209 99 45 43 38 17 295
P. L. Jain United States 13 442 2.1× 59 0.6× 16 0.4× 83 1.9× 46 1.2× 55 515
C. Cattadori Italy 13 361 1.7× 191 1.9× 56 1.2× 97 2.3× 36 0.9× 67 517
M. Nessi Switzerland 7 124 0.6× 86 0.9× 20 0.4× 49 1.1× 16 0.4× 27 188
R. W. Harper United States 10 86 0.4× 68 0.7× 69 1.5× 55 1.3× 85 2.2× 26 295
J. Amaré Spain 10 241 1.2× 124 1.3× 32 0.7× 98 2.3× 45 1.2× 46 335
J. Pouthas France 10 237 1.1× 152 1.5× 24 0.5× 82 1.9× 20 0.5× 22 302
Shoji Nagamiya Japan 11 190 0.9× 85 0.9× 15 0.3× 59 1.4× 16 0.4× 29 280
D. M. Wolfe United States 12 275 1.3× 81 0.8× 18 0.4× 169 3.9× 9 0.2× 24 438
T. A. Armstrong United States 11 386 1.8× 84 0.8× 22 0.5× 98 2.3× 22 0.6× 38 453
J.E. Kammeraad United States 10 219 1.0× 186 1.9× 37 0.8× 58 1.3× 26 0.7× 14 301

Countries citing papers authored by J. Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Roberts. The network helps show where J. Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Roberts. J. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Roberts, J., et al.. (2025). Navigating power dynamics in student-staff partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners. 9(2). 29–48.
2.
Bylsma, B., D. R. Cady, A. Çelik, et al.. (2012). Radiation testing of electronics for the CMS endcap muon system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 698. 242–248. 6 indexed citations
3.
Sadowski, B, José Luis Martín Rodríguez, Richard E. Symmonds, et al.. (2011). Comparison of polypropylene versus polyester mesh in the Lichtenstein hernia repair with respect to chronic pain and discomfort. Hernia. 15(6). 643–654. 19 indexed citations
4.
James, Scott, et al.. (2010). Simulating environmental changes due to marine hydrokinetic energy installations. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1–10. 29 indexed citations
5.
Covi, Laura, Jasper Hasenkamp, Stefan Pokorski, & J. Roberts. (2009). Gravitino dark matter and general neutralino NLSP. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2009(11). 3–3. 43 indexed citations
6.
Geurts, F. J. M., M. Shao, B. E. Bonner, et al.. (2004). Performance of the prototype MRPC detector for STAR. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 533(1-2). 60–64. 21 indexed citations
7.
Bonner, B. E., H.F. Chen, X. Dong, et al.. (2004). The performance of the TOFr tray in STAR. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 538(1-3). 243–248. 28 indexed citations
8.
Naab, Fabián, et al.. (2004). The role of metallic impurities in the interaction of carbon nanotubes with microwave radiation. 6 indexed citations
9.
Bonner, B. E., G. Eppley, F. J. M. Geurts, et al.. (2003). A single Time-of-Flight tray based on multigap resistive plate chambers for the STAR experiment at RHIC. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 508(1-2). 181–184. 45 indexed citations
10.
Roberts, J., et al.. (2003). Recursively partitioning neural networks for radar target recognition. 5. 3208–3212. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bonner, B. E., G. Eppley, J. Lamas-Valverde, et al.. (2002). A multigap resistive plate chamber prototype for time-of-flight for the STAR experiment at RHIC. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 478(1-2). 176–179. 37 indexed citations
12.
Matveev, M., J. Roberts, P. Padley, T. Nussbaum, & M. Tripathi. (2001). Optical Link Evaluation for the CSC Muon Trigger at CMS. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 379–382. 1 indexed citations
13.
Choi, Jinhyuk, D. Hatzifotiadou, J. Lamas-Valverde, et al.. (1999). A very large multigap resistive plate chamber. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 434(2-3). 362–372. 13 indexed citations
14.
Zeballos, E. Cerron, D. Hatzifotiadou, J. Lamas Valverde, et al.. (1998). Micro-streamers and the micro-gap Resistive Plate Chamber. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 411(1). 51–62. 4 indexed citations
15.
McNaughton, M. W., B. E. Bonner, C. L. Hollas, et al.. (1982). Spin transfer measurements forppppat 647 MeV. Physical Review C. 26(1). 249–251. 8 indexed citations
16.
Marshak, M., E. A. Peterson, K. Ruddick, et al.. (1978). Polarization in elasticppandpnscattering at 1.03 GeV. Physical Review C. 18(1). 331–336. 12 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, J. & R. M. Lynden‐Bell. (1971). The line shapes of a tumbling triplet. Molecular Physics. 21(4). 689–699. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026