J. Radcliffe

1.3k citations
44 papers · 887 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

J. Radcliffe

41 papers receiving 795 citations

Hit Papers

Branching Processes with Biological Applications5611977202619932009100200300400500

Peers

J. Radcliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Modeling and Simulation 284
  • Mathematical Physics 382
  • Statistics and Probability 139
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 361
  • Genetics 214
Replace Andrew D. Barbour with:
Andrew D. Barbour Switzerland
Sylvie Méléard France
P. K. Pollett Australia
Sylvie Méléard France
Nicolas Champagnat France
Ryszard Rudnicki Poland
Tokuzo Shiga Japan
Vladimir Vatutin Russia
Kōhei Uchiyama Japan
J. Theodore Cox United States
J. Radcliffe relative to Andrew D. Barbour Switzerland Andrew D. Barbour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Andrew D. Barbour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Radcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Radcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Radcliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Radcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Radcliffe. The network helps show where J. Radcliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 2 scholars most cited alongside J. Radcliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Radcliffe Line = papers co-authored together J. Radcliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200380
2
Global Asymptotic Convergence Results for Multitype Models
200014
3 19991
4 19991
5 19981
6 19981
7 19976
8 19962
9 19853
10 198412
11 19828
12
Branching Processes with Biological Applicationsbreakdown →
1977561
13 19765
14 19761
15 19741
16 19744
17 19742
18 19728
19 197214
20 19684

About J. Radcliffe

J. Radcliffe is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Mathematical Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability and Management Information Systems, having authored 44 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (19 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (19 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (10 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (4 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers) and Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (284 citations), Mathematical Physics (382 citations), Statistics and Probability (139 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (361 citations) and Genetics (214 citations). J. Radcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Jagers and Norman T. J. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, Mathematical Biosciences, Journal of Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026