J. Prous

26 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

J. Prous
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Pharmacology 67
  • Pharmacology 96
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 89
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
Replace David Hicks with:
David Hicks United States
Nancy Van Osselaer Belgium
Venkatesh Pilla Reddy United States
Mario Štefanović Croatia
Hui Xiao China
Kazutomi Kusano Japan
David Hreniuk United States
Babu Subramanyam United States
Melvin Reichman United States
Guowei Zhou China
J. Prous relative to David Hicks United States David Hicks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
David Hicks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Prous

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Prous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Prous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Prous more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Prous

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Prous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Prous. The network helps show where J. Prous may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Prous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Prous Line = papers co-authored together J. Prous links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Gateways to clinical trials.
2004169
2 2002132
3 2005110
4
Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer disease: from psychotropic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors to pharmacogenomics.
200051
5 200725
6 200525
7 200623
8 201323
9 199019
10 200217
11
Gateways to clinical trials. March 2003.
200314
12 201311
13 200110
14
The year's new drugs and biologics--2007.
20088
15
The story so far in R&D.
20076
16
The year's new drugs and biologics--2006.
20075
17 19883
18 19982
19 19902
20 19992

About J. Prous

J. Prous is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers), Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (67 citations), Pharmacology (96 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (89 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (71 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations). J. Prous has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Silvestre, X Rabasseda, M. Bayés, Raquel F. Reinoso, J. Castañer, Peter Revill, M.A. Moral, Courtland Robinson, Nakissa Sadrieh and Luis G. Valerio. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs of the Future, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Drug News & Perspectives, Drugs of today and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact