J. Phillips

616 total citations
11 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

J. Phillips is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Phillips has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in J. Phillips's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). J. Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). J. Phillips collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. J. Phillips's co-authors include Uta Noppeney, C.J. Price, Karl Friston, Joseph T. Devlin, R. S. J. Frackowiak, C. J. Moore, Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini, Catherine J. Mummery, D. Chawla and Christian Buechel and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Brain and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

J. Phillips

11 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

J. Phillips

CN

SP

DEP

ECP

PMH

K. E. Patterson United States

B. Randall United Kingdom

Francesca Borgo Italy

Maria Gorno Tempini United States

J Greene United Kingdom

Ramin Assadollahi Germany

Sebo Uithol Italy

Marion L. Kellenbach United Kingdom

Christine Whatmough Canada

Lea K. Pilgrim United Kingdom

K. E. Patterson United States

J. Phillips

416 ×1.0

CN

165 ×0.9

SP

140 ×1.3

DEP

74 ×0.8

ECP

66 ×2.8

PMH

Citations per year, relative to J. Phillips J. Phillips (= 1×) peers K. E. Patterson

Countries citing papers authored by J. Phillips

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Phillips

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Phillips. The network helps show where J. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Phillips. J. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Qian, Min, J. Phillips, Caroline Hellegers, et al.. (2023). Computerized Cognitive Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Findings in African Americans and Caucasians. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease. 11(1). 149–154. 4 indexed citations

2.

Noppeney, Uta, J. Phillips, & C.J. Price. (2004). The neural areas that control the retrieval and selection of semantics. Neuropsychologia. 42(9). 1269–1280. 82 indexed citations

3.

Price, C.J., Uta Noppeney, J. Phillips, & Joseph T. Devlin. (2003). HOW IS THE FUSIFORM GYRUS RELATED TO CATEGORY-SPECIFICITY?. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 20(3-6). 561–574. 41 indexed citations

4.

Devlin, Joseph T., C. J. Moore, Catherine J. Mummery, et al.. (2002). Anatomic Constraints on Cognitive Theories of Category Specificity. NeuroImage. 15(3). 675–685. 139 indexed citations

5.

Phillips, J.. (2002). Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits?. Brain. 125(9). 2067–2080. 68 indexed citations

6.

Phillips, J., Glyn W. Humphreys, Uta Noppeney, & Cathy J. Price. (2002). The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Visual Cognition. 9(4-5). 662–685. 40 indexed citations

7.

Price, C.J., C. J. Moore, J. Phillips, et al.. (2001). Are there reading specific brain areas? A meta-analysis of PET data from 72 subjects. NeuroImage. 13(6). 588–588. 1 indexed citations

8.

Phillips, J., Glyn W. Humphreys, & C.J. Price. (2000). The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action.. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 124–124. 1 indexed citations

9.

Phillips, J.. (2000). A COMPARISON OF SUBSTANCE USE BETWEEN FEMALE INMATES AND FEMALE SUBSTANCE MISUSERS IN TREATMENT. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 35(1). 60–65. 9 indexed citations

10.

Phillips, J., Glyn W. Humphreys, & C.J. Price. (1999). Different routes to action from words and pictures: Evidence from neuroimaging. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations

11.

Chawla, D., et al.. (1998). Speed-Dependent Motion-Sensitive Responses in V5: An fMRI Study. NeuroImage. 7(2). 86–96. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact