J. Peters

651 total citations
13 papers, 476 citations indexed

About

J. Peters is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Peters has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 476 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in J. Peters's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). J. Peters is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). J. Peters collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. J. Peters's co-authors include Katherine Boydell, Melanie Barwick, Jonathan Karnon, J. Chilcott, Joanne Platt, Naomi Brewer, Euphemia McGoogan, Yin Jiang, Eckard Wimmer and Aniko V. Paul and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Virology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

J. Peters

12 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

J. Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Epidemiology 182
  • General Health Professions 94
  • Infectious Diseases 73
  • Oncology 71
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 70
Replace Muhammad Arif Nadeem Saqib with:
Muhammad Arif Nadeem Saqib Pakistan
Mohana Kunasekaran Australia
Shajeea Arshad Ali Pakistan
Jamison Pike United States
Bismark Sarfo Ghana
J. Stevenson United Kingdom
Jinxin Zheng China
Kalaiarasu M. Peariasamy Malaysia
Tingting Cui China
Marco Del Riccio Italy
Muhammad Arif Nadeem Saqib Pakistan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to J. Peters
J. Peters · 1×
Citations per year, relative to J. Peters
J. Peters · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by J. Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Peters. The network helps show where J. Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Peters. J. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2
Core Public Health Functions for New Zealand.
7
3
Law Enforcement Services
1
4
Social Security History
4
5 91
6 13
7
Getting to uptake: do communities of practice support the implementation of evidence-based practice?
103
8 24
9 131
10 74
11
Resistance of cattle to scrapie by the oral route.
19
12 0
13 6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026