Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Review of Research on Subsonic Turbulent Flow Reattachment
1981562 citationsJohn K. Eaton, J. P. Johnstonprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. P. Johnston
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. P. Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. P. Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. P. Johnston more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. P. Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. P. Johnston. The network helps show where J. P. Johnston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. P. Johnston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. P. Johnston.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. P. Johnston based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. P. Johnston. J. P. Johnston is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnston, J. P., et al.. (2003). Performance of a Micro-scale Radial-Flow Compressor Impeller made of Silicon Nitride.15 indexed citations
Kline, S. J., J. P. Johnston, & R. J. Moffat. (1986). Studies of Shear Flows.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
5.
Moffat, R. J., et al.. (1985). Film cooling on a convex wall: Heat transfer and hydrodynamic measurements for full and partial coverage. PhDT.1 indexed citations
Simon, Terrence W., R. J. Moffat, J. P. Johnston, & W. M. Kays. (1980). Turbulent boundary layer heat transfer experiments: Convex curvature effects including introduction and recovery. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 81. 27434.9 indexed citations
8.
Johnston, J. P., et al.. (1980). An experimental investigation of two large annular diffusers with swirling and distorted inflow. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).2 indexed citations
9.
Gillis, J. & J. P. Johnston. (1979). Experiment on the turbulent boundary layer over convex walls and its recovery to flat-wall conditions. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
Johnston, J. P., et al.. (1974). Prediction of the effects of longitudinal wall curvature and system rotation on turbulent boundary layers.2 indexed citations
12.
Johnston, J. P.. (1974). The Effects of Rotation on Boundary Layers in Turbomachine Rotors. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 304. 207–249.14 indexed citations
Johnston, J. P., et al.. (1967). THE INFLUENCE OF ROTATION ON FLOW IN A LONG RECTANGULAR CHANNEL: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY,. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.