J. N. Thompson
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Genetics
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Co-authors
- G. A. J. PittM.L. ScottJ. M. HowellJ.McC. HowellW. A. CowardJ. McC. HowellCatherine HoughtonNeil A. Collier
- Topics
- Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (11 papers)Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (9 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
J. N. Thompson
26 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Molecular Biology 593
- Nutrition and Dietetics 407
- Biochemistry 320
- Genetics 176
- Animal Science and Zoology 172
Countries citing papers authored by J. N. Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of J. N. Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. N. Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. N. Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. N. Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. N. Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. N. Thompson. The network helps show where J. N. Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. N. Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. N. Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. N. Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. N. Thompson. J. N. Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Determination of vitamin A in milk and infant formula by HPLC | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | Blindness resulting from vitamin A deficiency in albino and pigmented guinea pigs and rats. | 4 |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 141 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | The development of lesions in vitamin A-deficient adult fowl. | 2 |
| 11 | 170 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 117 | |
| 17 | 354 | |
| 18 | 100 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About J. N. Thompson
J. N. Thompson is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Animal Science and Zoology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (11 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (9 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (320 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (407 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (172 citations). J. N. Thompson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. A. J. Pitt, M.L. Scott, J. M. Howell, J.McC. Howell, W. A. Coward, J. McC. Howell, Catherine Houghton, Neil A. Collier, L.H. Blumgart and R. A. Morton. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Nutrition and British Journal Of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.