Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Rivet user manual
2013285 citationsA. G. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Monk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Monk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Monk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Monk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Monk. The network helps show where J. Monk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Monk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Monk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Monk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Monk. J. Monk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aad, G., J. Abdallah, S. Abdel Khalek, et al.. (2014). Measurements of normalized differential cross sections for t ¯ t production in p p collisions at √ ( s ) = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector. Americanae (AECID Library).
6.
Abbott, B., J. Abdallah, S. Abdel‐Khalek, et al.. (2014). Measurement of long-range pseudorapidity correlations and azimuthal harmonics in s N N = 5.02 ¾TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town).
7.
Aad, G., J. Abdallah, S. Abdel Khalek, et al.. (2014). Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65-600 GeV with the ATLAS Detector in pp Collision Data at âs = 8 TeV. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
8.
Aad, G., J. Abdallah, S. Abdel Khalek, et al.. (2014). Measurement of the Z/γ* boson transverse momentum distribution in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
9.
Abdallah, J., O. Abdinov, M. Abolins, et al.. (2014). Search for Invisible Decays of a Higgs Boson Produced in Association with a Z Boson in ATLAS. Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
10.
Aad, G., B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, et al.. (2014). Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Physical Review Letters.18 indexed citations
11.
Buckley, A. G., J. M. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, et al.. (2013). Rivet user manual. Computer Physics Communications. 184(12). 2803–2819.285 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Monk, J. & C. Oropeza Barrera. (2012). The HBOM method for unfolding detector effects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 701. 17–24.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.