Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Improved technique for estimating pleural pressure from esophageal balloons
Countries citing papers authored by J. Milic‐Emili
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Milic‐Emili's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Milic‐Emili with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Milic‐Emili more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Milic‐Emili. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Milic‐Emili. The network helps show where J. Milic‐Emili may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Milic‐Emili
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Milic‐Emili.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Milic‐Emili based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Milic‐Emili. J. Milic‐Emili is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pardy, Richard L., Robert N. Rivington, J. Milic‐Emili, & Jacopo P. Mortola. (2015). Control of Breathing in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Review of Respiratory Disease.
2.
Rossi, Andrea, Stewart B. Gottfried, Luciano Zocchi, et al.. (2015). Measurement of Static Compliance of the Total Respiratory System in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure during Mechanical Ventilation. American Review of Respiratory Disease.4 indexed citations
3.
Milic‐Emili, J., et al.. (2015). Workshop on Assessment of Respiratory Control in Humans: V. The Use of Loads to Study Ventilatory Control. American Review of Respiratory Disease.
4.
Kosmas, Epaminondas, et al.. (2009). Exercise testing and exercise-limiting factors in patients with bilateral bronchiectasis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
Valta, Päivi, C. Corbeil, Michaël Chassé, J. Braidy, & J. Milic‐Emili. (1996). Mean Airway Pressure as an Index of Mean Alveolar Pressure. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 153(6). 1825–1830.9 indexed citations
Milic‐Emili, J., F. M. Robatto, & Joseph H. Bates. (1990). RESPIRATORY MECHANICS IN ANAESTHESIA. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 65(1). 4–12.51 indexed citations
19.
Gautier, H., et al.. (1979). [Ventilatory effects of various respiratory stimulants in awake cats (author's transl)].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 15 Suppl. 183–93.1 indexed citations
20.
Trippenbach, Teresa & J. Milic‐Emili. (1977). Vagal contribution to the inspiratory 'off-switch' mechanism.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 36(10). 2395–9.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.