J. Merlin

109 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

J. Merlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Biochemistry 255
  • Metals and Alloys 79
  • Analytical Chemistry 194
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 170
  • Organic Chemistry 535
Replace Jens Toft with:
Jens Toft Denmark
Gang Ma China
A. Block-Bolten United States
K. Motzfeldt Norway
Warren M. Garrison United States
K. Senthilkumar India
Éric Hénon France
Enrico Prenesti Italy
J. M. Toguri Canada
Gregory A. Chass Canada
J. Merlin relative to Jens Toft Denmark Jens Toft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Jens Toft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Merlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Merlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Merlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Merlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Merlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Merlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Merlin. The network helps show where J. Merlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Merlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Merlin Line = papers co-authored together J. Merlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002239
2 1988102
3 201196
4 200090
5 200081
6 201173
7 200369
8 199967
9 200667
10 200162
11 200448
12 199345
13 201244
14 199543
15 200043
16 198541
17 198438
18 199438
19 198134
20 200334

About J. Merlin

J. Merlin is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (27 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (15 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (14 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (13 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (11 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (8 papers) and Laser Material Processing Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (255 citations), Metals and Alloys (79 citations), Analytical Chemistry (194 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (170 citations) and Organic Chemistry (535 citations). J. Merlin has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include J.P. Cornard, V. Massardier, P. Merle, F. Fouquet, C. Brémard, Jacques José, Damien Fabrègue, L. Vrielynck, J. Laureyns and Raymond Brouillard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Journal of Chromatography A and Materials Science and Engineering A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact