J. M. Stanton
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology
- Insect Science top 10%
- Small Animals
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Andrew F. HugallCraig MoritzVernon E. SteeleDavid R. WolstenholmeAnthony B. PattisonD. T. KaplanJean‐Louis SarahL.M. Frisse
- Topics
- Nematode management and characterization studies (22 papers)Cassava research and cyanide (9 papers)Banana Cultivation and Research (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Plant ScienceInsect ScienceEcology
In The Last Decade
J. M. Stanton
26 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Plant Science 356
- Ecology 102
- Insect Science 73
- Small Animals 23
- Molecular Biology 20
Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Stanton. The network helps show where J. M. Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Stanton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Stanton. J. M. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Improved control of nematodes in carrot production | 1 |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) did not affect banana production in subtropical Australia. | 3 |
| 5 | Phylogenetic Analysis of Geographically Diverse Radopholus similis via rDNA Sequence Reveals a Monomorphic Motif. | 30 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | Nucleotide polymorphisms and an improved PCR-based mtDNA diagnostic for parthenogenetic root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) | 71 |
| 10 | 100 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Diseases of Desmodium species - a review. | 1 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with tropical pastures in Colombia | 6 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Nematodes of forage legumes and grasses : catalogue and bibliography, 1961-1985 | 1 |
| 19 | Potato Cyst Nematode. | 5 |
| 20 | 2 |
About J. M. Stanton
J. M. Stanton is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nematode management and characterization studies (22 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (9 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (356 citations), Insect Science (73 citations) and Ecology (102 citations). J. M. Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew F. Hugall, Craig Moritz, Vernon E. Steele, David R. Wolstenholme, Anthony B. Pattison, D. T. Kaplan, Jean‐Louis Sarah, L.M. Frisse, V. J. Doogan and W. Kelley Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Nematology and Australasian Plant Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.