Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Numerical Hamiltonian Problems
1994948 citationsJ. M. Sanz‐Serna, M. P. Calvoprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Sanz‐Serna
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Sanz‐Serna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Sanz‐Serna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Sanz‐Serna more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Sanz‐Serna
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Sanz‐Serna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Sanz‐Serna. The network helps show where J. M. Sanz‐Serna may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Sanz‐Serna
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Sanz‐Serna.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Sanz‐Serna based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Sanz‐Serna. J. M. Sanz‐Serna is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beskos, Alexandros, F. J. Pinski, J. M. Sanz‐Serna, & Andrew M. Stuart. (2011). Hybrid Monte Carlo on Hilbert spaces. Stochastic Processes and their Applications. 121(10). 2201–2230.59 indexed citations
6.
Sanz‐Serna, J. M.. (2008). Matemáticas y medicina. 11(4). 665–678.
Verwer, J.G., Joke Blom, & J. M. Sanz‐Serna. (1988). An adaptive moving grid method for one-dimensional systems of partial differential equations. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 1–27.1 indexed citations
12.
Blom, Joke, J. M. Sanz‐Serna, & J.G. Verwer. (1987). A Lagrangian moving grid scheme for one-dimensional evolutionary partial differential equations. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 247–255.5 indexed citations
13.
Sanz‐Serna, J. M. & J.G. Verwer. (1986). Stability and convergence in the PDE/stiff ODE interphase. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 1–14.1 indexed citations
14.
Blom, Joke, J. M. Sanz‐Serna, & J.G. Verwer. (1986). On simple moving grid methods for one-dimensional evolutionary partial differential equations. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 1–19.4 indexed citations
Verwer, J.G. & J. M. Sanz‐Serna. (1984). Convergence of method of lines approximations to partial differential equations. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 1–14.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.