Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations
2010779 citationsJ.F. Chen, J. M. Rotter et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Rotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Rotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Rotter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Rotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Rotter. The network helps show where J. M. Rotter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Rotter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Rotter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Rotter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Rotter. J. M. Rotter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rotter, J. M.. (2009). Silos and tanks in research and practice: state of the art and current challenges. RiuNet (Politechnical University of Valencia).14 indexed citations
6.
Rotter, J. M., et al.. (2009). Stability of column-supported steel cylinders with engaged columns. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 2535–2546.5 indexed citations
Wood, David Muir, et al.. (1998). Mechanics of granular materials in engineering and earth sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 356(1747).1 indexed citations
11.
Rotter, J. M.. (1998). Metal silos. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials. 1(4). 428–435.7 indexed citations
Chen, J.F., J.Y. Ooi, & J. M. Rotter. (1996). A method for determining unsymmetrical pressures in circular silos using wall strain measurements. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast).1 indexed citations
14.
Chen, J.F., J.Y. Ooi, & J. M. Rotter. (1994). Local stiffening effect of 'Double Deck' bending strain gauges and its correction. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast).1 indexed citations
15.
Rotter, J. M.. (1988). The Structural Design of Steel Silos for Agricultural Applications. 333.1 indexed citations
16.
Rotter, J. M., et al.. (1987). Corrugation Collapse in Circumferentially Corrugated Steel Cylinders. 377.1 indexed citations
17.
Rotter, J. M. & J.G. Teng. (1987). Elastic Stability of Cylindrical Shells with Circumferential Lap Joints. 515.2 indexed citations
18.
Bradford, Mark A., et al.. (1987). Australian Limit State Design Rules for the Stability of Steel Structures. 1. 209.9 indexed citations
19.
Rotter, J. M., et al.. (1987). Shell Restraint to Ringbeam Buckling in Elevated Steel Silos. 604.11 indexed citations
20.
Ooi, J.Y. & J. M. Rotter. (1986). The Effect of Wall Flexibility on Pressures in Squat Steel Silos. 115.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.