J. M. Clem
- Radiation top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- P. GoldhagenJohn WilsonKenneth P. RodbellPaul BaileyHaotian TangMichael S. GordonT.H. ZabelD. H. Humes
- Topics
- Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4 papers)Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers)Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers)
- Journals
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated EquipmentIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceAdvances in Space Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanItaly
In The Last Decade
J. M. Clem
11 papers receiving 498 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Radiation 189
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 161
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 159
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 120
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 108
Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Clem
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Clem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Clem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Clem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Clem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Clem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Clem. The network helps show where J. M. Clem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Clem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Clem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Clem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Clem. J. M. Clem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Response of IceTop tanks to low-energy particles | 4 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 104 | |
| 6 | 262 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | SMILI (Superconducting Magnet Instrument for Light Isotopes) A Balloon Borne Magnet Spectrometer | 1 |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 25 |
About J. M. Clem
J. M. Clem is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (189 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (120 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (39 citations). J. M. Clem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include P. Goldhagen, John Wilson, Kenneth P. Rodbell, Paul Bailey, Haotian Tang, Michael S. Gordon, T.H. Zabel, D. H. Humes, Giovanni De Angelis and M. S. Clowdsley. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science and Advances in Space Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.