J Lang
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Papers in
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 5
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Alexa Beiser (1 shared paper)D. Luisa Mayer (1 shared paper)Marjorie Rah (2 shared papers)Li Deng (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice (1 paper)Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (2 papers)Optometry (1 paper)PubMed (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
J Lang
11 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Ophthalmology 37
- Epidemiology 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 49
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 37
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 16
Countries citing papers authored by J Lang
This map shows the geographic impact of J Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Lang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J Lang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Lang. The network helps show where J Lang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside J Lang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between ages one month and four years. | 1995 | 155 |
| 2 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 3 | Reading capacity in cases of 'cured' strabismic amblyopia. | 1980 | 16 |
| 4 | An efficient treatment and new criteria for cure of strabismic amblyopia: reading and Bangerter foils. | 1999 | 11 |
| 5 | [The significance of primary microstrabismus for the development of squint]. | 1967 | 6 |
| 6 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 7 | [Scotoma in the binocular field of vision in severe amblyopia and microstrabismus (author's transl)]. | 1978 | 4 |
| 8 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 11 | [Diagnosis and treatment of amblyopia]. | 1996 | 1 |
About J Lang
J Lang is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, Neurology and Ophthalmology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders (1 paper), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (1 paper) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (37 citations), Epidemiology (84 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (37 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (16 citations). J Lang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alexa Beiser, D. Luisa Mayer, Marjorie Rah and Li Deng. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, Optometry and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.