J. Klenzing

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
60 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

J. Klenzing is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Klenzing has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24 papers in Molecular Biology and 15 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in J. Klenzing's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (50 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (28 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (24 papers). J. Klenzing is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (50 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (28 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (24 papers). J. Klenzing collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. J. Klenzing's co-authors include J. D. Huba, Kate Zawdie, Eelco Doornbos, D. P. Drob, J. Noto, S. E. McDonald, J. W. Meriwether, G. Hernández, J. T. Emmert and M. Conde and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal and Geophysical Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

J. Klenzing

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

An update to the Horizontal Wind Model (HWM): The quiet t... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Klenzing United States 15 925 369 282 250 201 60 1.1k
Young‐Sil Kwak South Korea 18 1.1k 1.2× 482 1.3× 335 1.2× 331 1.3× 154 0.8× 114 1.1k
Dimitry Pokhotelov United Kingdom 17 1.3k 1.4× 560 1.5× 337 1.2× 363 1.5× 121 0.6× 46 1.4k
R. J. Redmon United States 21 1.2k 1.3× 525 1.4× 229 0.8× 358 1.4× 152 0.8× 78 1.3k
J. Noto United States 14 781 0.8× 278 0.8× 202 0.7× 166 0.7× 300 1.5× 53 941
K. N. Iyer India 17 985 1.1× 531 1.4× 431 1.5× 266 1.1× 148 0.7× 63 1.2k
E. Correia Brazil 18 843 0.9× 321 0.9× 155 0.5× 149 0.6× 100 0.5× 85 926
Tzu‐Wei Fang United States 24 1.6k 1.8× 602 1.6× 423 1.5× 454 1.8× 448 2.2× 52 1.7k
Dalia Burešová Czechia 23 1.4k 1.5× 911 2.5× 568 2.0× 301 1.2× 149 0.7× 87 1.4k
Feng Ding China 24 1.5k 1.6× 954 2.6× 678 2.4× 275 1.1× 170 0.8× 88 1.6k
P. R. Straus United States 12 954 1.0× 360 1.0× 345 1.2× 187 0.7× 251 1.2× 33 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Klenzing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Klenzing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Klenzing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Klenzing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Klenzing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Klenzing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Klenzing. The network helps show where J. Klenzing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Klenzing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Klenzing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Klenzing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Klenzing. J. Klenzing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Supnithi, Pornchai, et al.. (2025). Spatio-temporal characteristics of ionospheric irregularities in low latitude regions during the peak of solar cycle 25. Advances in Space Research. 76(1). 254–268.
2.
Murphy, K. R., Alexa Halford, Vincent Liu, et al.. (2025). Understanding and Modeling the Dynamics of Storm‐Time Atmospheric Neutral Density Using Random Forests. Space Weather. 23(1).
3.
Liu, Guiping, J. Klenzing, S. E. McDonald, Fabrizio Sassi, & D. E. Rowland. (2024). Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere Temperatures Simulated by WACCM‐X With NAVGEM‐HA Meteorological Analyses and Compared to SABER Observations. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
St.‐Maurice, J.‐P., et al.. (2024). Plasma Structure Decay Rates in the Equatorial Ionosphere Are Strongly Coupled by Turbulence. Geophysical Research Letters. 51(18). 1 indexed citations
6.
Halford, Alexa, A. G. Burrell, M. W. Liemohn, et al.. (2023). Cultivating a culture of inclusivity in heliophysics. Frontiers in Physics. 11. 5 indexed citations
7.
Zettergren, M. D., et al.. (2023). Kinetic Modeling of Ionospheric Outflows in Pressure Cooker Environments. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Zawdie, Kate, Fabrizio Sassi, K. Greer, et al.. (2023). Impacts of Neutral Atmospheric Waves on the Ionosphere.
9.
Rowland, D. E., Alexa Halford, J. Klenzing, et al.. (2023). Cross-Scale and Cross-Regime Coupling in the ITM: Studying Weather, not just Climate, in the Middle and Upper Atmosphere. 1 indexed citations
10.
Klenzing, J., Alexa Halford, Guiping Liu, et al.. (2023). A system science perspective of the drivers of equatorial plasma bubbles. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 9. 5 indexed citations
11.
Halford, Alexa, A. G. Burrell, Ryan McGranaghan, et al.. (2023). The importance of recruitment and retention in Heliophysics: it’s not just a pipeline problem. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 10.
12.
Stoneback, R., A. G. Burrell, J. Klenzing, & J. M. Smith. (2023). The pysat ecosystem. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 10. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pfaff, R. F., Erhan Kudeki, H. Freudenreich, et al.. (2022). Dual Sounding Rocket and C/NOFS Satellite Observations of DC Electric Fields and Plasma Density in the Equatorial E‐ and F‐Region Ionosphere at Sunset. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 127(5). e2021JA030191–e2021JA030191. 4 indexed citations
14.
Pfaff, R. F., M. F. Larsen, Takumi Abe, et al.. (2020). Daytime Dynamo Electrodynamics With Spiral Currents Driven by Strong Winds Revealed by Vapor Trails and Sounding Rocket Probes. Geophysical Research Letters. 47(15). e2020GL088803–e2020GL088803. 16 indexed citations
15.
Verkhoglyadova, O. P., Amir Caspi, D. R. Jackson, et al.. (2020). Addressing Gaps in Space Weather Operations and Understanding With Small Satellites. Space Weather. 19(3). 7 indexed citations
16.
Rowland, D. E., J. Moen, R. F. Pfaff, et al.. (2019). VISIONS-2 observations of the electrodynamics of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019. 1 indexed citations
17.
Pfaff, R. F., D. E. Rowland, J. Klenzing, et al.. (2018). A Large Amplitude (>300 M/S) Neutral Wind "Jet" Observed Near 130 km Altitude and Associated DC Electric Fields, Energetic Electron and Other Measurements Revealed by a Vapor Trail and Dual Sounding Rocket and Ground-Based Instruments in the Auroral Zone Lower Ionosphere. AGUFM. 2018. 1 indexed citations
18.
Clemmons, J. H., C. Lemon, J. H. Hecht, et al.. (2013). Accelerated Auroral Zone Ions: Results from the VISIONS Mission. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pfaff, R. F., J. Klenzing, H. Freudenreich, et al.. (2009). Structured DC Electric Fields With and Without Associated Plasma Density Gradients Observed with the C/NOFS Satellite. 2009.
20.
Klenzing, J., et al.. (2009). FIREFLY: A cubesat mission to study terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026