J. Jerome Smith

577 total citations
10 papers, 386 citations indexed

About

J. Jerome Smith is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Geography, Planning and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Jerome Smith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 386 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 2 papers in Linguistics and Language and 2 papers in Geography, Planning and Development. Recurrent topics in J. Jerome Smith's work include Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper) and Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (1 paper). J. Jerome Smith is often cited by papers focused on Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper) and Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (1 paper). J. Jerome Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Jerome Smith's co-authors include Stephen P. Borgatti, Diane M. Mackie, Leila T. Worth, Robert A. Benfer, Patrick Vinton Kirch, Peter Bellwood, Byron W. Bender, Robert Blust, Mac Marshall and Ann Chowning and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychology and Marketing, Sex Roles and Current Anthropology.

In The Last Decade

J. Jerome Smith

10 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Jerome Smith United States 6 95 66 63 58 50 10 386
Cynthia Gordon United States 14 91 1.0× 112 1.7× 62 1.0× 26 0.4× 112 2.2× 36 698
Lilian Apaza United States 8 87 0.9× 77 1.2× 66 1.0× 8 0.1× 77 1.5× 9 513
Cristian Adasme‐Berríos Chile 13 146 1.5× 135 2.0× 26 0.4× 57 1.0× 72 1.4× 57 430
Mie Kito Japan 11 256 2.7× 143 2.2× 73 1.2× 23 0.4× 20 0.4× 18 392
Boyka Bratanova United Kingdom 13 202 2.1× 221 3.3× 43 0.7× 78 1.3× 61 1.2× 17 656
Mathew Ling Australia 16 80 0.8× 293 4.4× 57 0.9× 77 1.3× 69 1.4× 43 948
Peter Gill Australia 15 73 0.8× 107 1.6× 41 0.7× 19 0.3× 150 3.0× 45 674
Chris Thomas United Kingdom 17 99 1.0× 65 1.0× 42 0.7× 8 0.1× 39 0.8× 77 854
Donna Maurer United States 5 35 0.4× 62 0.9× 11 0.2× 31 0.5× 30 0.6× 6 304
Kim Janssens Netherlands 9 65 0.7× 75 1.1× 80 1.3× 115 2.0× 79 1.6× 25 350

Countries citing papers authored by J. Jerome Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Jerome Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Jerome Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Jerome Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Jerome Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Jerome Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Jerome Smith. The network helps show where J. Jerome Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Jerome Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Jerome Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Jerome Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Jerome Smith. J. Jerome Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Smith, J. Jerome & Stephen P. Borgatti. (1997). Salience Counts—And So Does Accuracy: Correcting and Updating a Measure for Free‐List‐Item Salience. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 7(2). 208–209. 130 indexed citations
2.
Hindin, Rita, et al.. (1996). Strategies for Follow-up of Drug Users: Field Research Guidelines. Substance Use & Misuse. 31(13). 1891–1927. 2 indexed citations
3.
Smith, J. Jerome, et al.. (1996). The Emergence of Color Cognition from Color Perception. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 6(2). 223–240. 13 indexed citations
4.
Smith, J. Jerome, et al.. (1995). Salience Counts: A Domain Analysis of English Color Terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 5(2). 203–216. 41 indexed citations
5.
Smith, J. Jerome. (1993). Using ANTHOPAC 3.5 and a Spreadsheet to Compute a Free-List Salience Index. 5(3). 1–3. 106 indexed citations
6.
Worth, Leila T., J. Jerome Smith, & Diane M. Mackie. (1992). Gender schematicity and preference for gender‐typed products. Psychology and Marketing. 9(1). 17–30. 70 indexed citations
7.
Smith, J. Jerome. (1990). Pasteboard Ethnography: Qualitative Fieldwork Projects in Card‐Game Settings. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 21(2). 146–152. 2 indexed citations
8.
Marshall, Mac, Peter Bellwood, Byron W. Bender, et al.. (1984). Structural Patterns of Sibling Classification in Island Oceania: Implications for Culture History [and Comments and Replies]. Current Anthropology. 25(5). 597–637. 16 indexed citations
9.
Smith, J. Jerome. (1981). Gender marking on citizens band radio: Self-identity in a limited-channel speech community. Sex Roles. 7(6). 599–606. 4 indexed citations
10.
Smith, J. Jerome. (1979). Male and female ways of speaking: Elaborately restricted codes in a CB speech community. Paper in Linguistics. 12(1-2). 163–184. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026