Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions
2019421 citationsT. DebRoy, Tuhin Mukherjee et al.Nature Materialsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Blecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Blecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Blecher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Blecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Blecher. The network helps show where J. J. Blecher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. J. Blecher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. J. Blecher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. J. Blecher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. J. Blecher. J. J. Blecher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
DebRoy, T., Tuhin Mukherjee, J. Milewski, et al.. (2019). Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions. Nature Materials. 18(10). 1026–1032.421 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Blecher, J. J., Todd Palmer, & T. DebRoy. (2016). Porosity in thick section alloy 690 welds - Experiments, modeling, mechanism, and remedy. Welding Journal. 95(1).14 indexed citations
6.
Dunbar, Alexander J., Abdalla R. Nassar, Edward W. Reutzel, & J. J. Blecher. (2016). A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Metal Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing.16 indexed citations
7.
Dunbar, Alexander J., Abdalla R. Nassar, Edward W. Reutzel, & J. J. Blecher. (2016). Digital data requirements for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing and the implementation of a transparent communication architecture.1 indexed citations
8.
Wei, Huiliang, J. J. Blecher, Todd Palmer, & T. DebRoy. (2015). Fusion zone microstructure and geometry in complete-joint-penetration laser-arc hybrid welding of low-alloy steel. Welding Journal. 94(4).12 indexed citations
9.
Blecher, J. J., Todd Palmer, & T. DebRoy. (2015). Mitigation of root defect in laser and hybrid laser-arc welding: A model is developed that predicts the range of processing conditions that produce defect-free, complete-joint-penetration welds. Welding Journal. 94(3).4 indexed citations
Blecher, J. J., Todd Palmer, & T. DebRoy. (2013). Solidification Map of a Nickel-Base Alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 45(4). 2142–2151.81 indexed citations
12.
Blecher, J. J., Todd Palmer, S. M. Kelly, & R. P. Martukanitz. (2012). Identifying performance differences in transmissive and reflective laser optics using beam diagnostic tools. 91(7).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.