J. I. Ten

1.1k total citations
25 papers, 862 citations indexed

About

J. I. Ten is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, J. I. Ten has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 862 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 17 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 15 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in J. I. Ten's work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (18 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (17 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (14 papers). J. I. Ten is often cited by papers focused on Radiation Dose and Imaging (18 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (17 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (14 papers). J. I. Ten collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United States and Italy. J. I. Ten's co-authors include E. Vañó, J. Fernández, L. González, E. Guibelalde, Carlos Macaya, Carlos Prieto, Javier Goicolea, Roberto Sánchez, Margarita Chevalier and Luciano González and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

J. I. Ten

24 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. I. Ten Spain 13 759 456 265 120 76 25 862
P. Ortiz-López Austria 6 716 0.9× 431 0.9× 144 0.5× 67 0.6× 45 0.6× 7 811
Turan Olğar Türkiye 11 388 0.5× 194 0.4× 262 1.0× 63 0.5× 27 0.4× 25 467
Christopher H. Cagnon United States 15 719 0.9× 402 0.9× 316 1.2× 73 0.6× 15 0.2× 21 879
Carlos Ubeda Chile 13 428 0.6× 223 0.5× 152 0.6× 77 0.6× 72 0.9× 62 498
E. Yakoumakis Greece 13 371 0.5× 164 0.4× 162 0.6× 60 0.5× 18 0.2× 33 464
Eugene Mah United States 10 304 0.4× 206 0.5× 176 0.7× 55 0.5× 14 0.2× 19 397
C. Maccia France 11 437 0.6× 174 0.4× 111 0.4× 42 0.3× 130 1.7× 39 554
Thomas B. Shope United States 7 571 0.8× 416 0.9× 115 0.4× 173 1.4× 42 0.6× 9 689
C. Étard France 13 415 0.5× 241 0.5× 126 0.5× 95 0.8× 13 0.2× 34 497
Dean W. Broga United States 7 402 0.5× 169 0.4× 71 0.3× 37 0.3× 37 0.5× 10 552

Countries citing papers authored by J. I. Ten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. I. Ten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. I. Ten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. I. Ten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. I. Ten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. I. Ten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. I. Ten. The network helps show where J. I. Ten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. I. Ten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. I. Ten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. I. Ten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. I. Ten. J. I. Ten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vañó, E., J. Fernández, J. I. Ten, & Roberto Sánchez. (2022). Occupational and patient doses for interventional radiology integrated into a dose management system. British Journal of Radiology. 96(1143). 20220607–20220607. 7 indexed citations
2.
Vañó, E., J. Fernández, J. I. Ten, & Roberto Sánchez. (2022). Benefits and limitations for the use of radiation dose management systems in medical imaging. Practical experience in a university hospital. British Journal of Radiology. 95(1133). 20211340–20211340. 14 indexed citations
3.
Sánchez, Roberto, et al.. (2019). Conversion factors to estimate effective doses from kerma area product in interventional cardiology. Impact of added filtration. Physica Medica. 68. 104–111. 9 indexed citations
4.
Fernández, J., et al.. (2015). Benefits of an automatic patient dose registry system for interventional radiology and cardiology at five hospitals of the Madrid area. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 165(1-4). 53–56. 5 indexed citations
5.
Prieto, Carlos, et al.. (2015). Experience in retake analysis for digital mammography at a university hospital. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 165(1-4). 354–358. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ten, J. I., E. Vañó, Roberto Sánchez, & J. Fernández. (2015). Automatic patient dose registry and clinical audit on line for mammography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 165(1-4). 346–349. 6 indexed citations
7.
Ten, J. I., J. Fernández, & E. Vañó. (2011). Automatic management system for dose parameters in interventional radiology and cardiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 147(1-2). 325–328. 16 indexed citations
8.
Vañó, E., et al.. (2008). Quality control and patient dosimetry in digital radiology. On line system: new features and transportability. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 129(1-3). 144–146. 8 indexed citations
9.
Prieto, Carlos, E. Vañó, J. I. Ten, et al.. (2008). Image Retake Analysis in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Header Information. Journal of Digital Imaging. 22(4). 393–399. 37 indexed citations
10.
Vañó, E., et al.. (2008). Paediatric entrance doses from exposure index in computed radiography. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 53(12). 3365–3380. 12 indexed citations
11.
Vañó, E., J. Fernández, J. I. Ten, et al.. (2007). Transition from Screen-Film to Digital Radiography: Evolution of Patient Radiation Doses at Projection Radiography. Radiology. 243(2). 461–466. 45 indexed citations
12.
Vañó, E., J. Fernández, J. I. Ten, et al.. (2005). Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 117(1-3). 199–203. 10 indexed citations
13.
Vañó, E., R. Padovani, Guglielmo Bernardi, et al.. (2005). On the use of DICOM cine header information for optimisation: results from the 2002 European DIMOND cardiology survey. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 117(1-3). 162–165. 5 indexed citations
14.
Chevalier, Margarita, et al.. (2005). A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 114(1-3). 375–379. 23 indexed citations
15.
Chevalier, Margarita, et al.. (2004). Patient dose in digital mammography. Medical Physics. 31(9). 2471–2479. 47 indexed citations
16.
Vañó, E., J. Fernández, J. I. Ten, et al.. (2002). Real-Time Measurement and Audit of Radiation Dose to Patients Undergoing Computed Radiography. Radiology. 225(1). 283–288. 21 indexed citations
17.
Guibelalde, E., et al.. (2001). The Use of Dynamic Phantoms in Interventional Radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 94(1). 155–159. 5 indexed citations
18.
Vañó, E., L. González, J. I. Ten, et al.. (2001). Skin dose and dose–area product values for interventional cardiology procedures. British Journal of Radiology. 74(877). 48–55. 103 indexed citations
19.
Vañó, E., et al.. (2001). Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures. British Journal of Radiology. 74(887). 1023–1031. 105 indexed citations
20.
Vañó, E., L. González, E. Guibelalde, J. Fernández, & J. I. Ten. (1998). Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology.. British Journal of Radiology. 71(849). 954–960. 298 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026