J. Gibson Lanier
About
In The Last Decade
J. Gibson Lanier
8 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Immunology 984
- Transplantation 347
- Epidemiology 264
- Surgery 213
- Oncology 151
Countries citing papers authored by J. Gibson Lanier
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Gibson Lanier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Gibson Lanier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Gibson Lanier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Gibson Lanier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Gibson Lanier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Gibson Lanier. The network helps show where J. Gibson Lanier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Gibson Lanier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Gibson Lanier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Gibson Lanier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Gibson Lanier. J. Gibson Lanier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 484 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 458 | |
| 5 | 181 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 18 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.