J. G. Hoessel

8.4k citations
114 papers · 4.2k indexed · h-index 38

J. G. Hoessel

111 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

J. G. Hoessel
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Instrumentation 1.3k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 4.1k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 450
  • Spectroscopy 192
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 83
Replace P. Fouqué with:
P. Fouqué France
C. A. Pilachowski United States
J. A. Frogel United States
Jr. Kennicutt Robert C. United States
Fabio Bresolin United States
Kris Davidson United States
N. Panagia United States
M. W. Feast South Africa
G. P. Smith United Kingdom
C. Ledoux Chile
J. G. Hoessel relative to P. Fouqué France P. Fouqué's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
P. Fouqué · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. G. Hoessel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. G. Hoessel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. G. Hoessel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. G. Hoessel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. G. Hoessel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. G. Hoessel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. G. Hoessel. The network helps show where J. G. Hoessel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. G. Hoessel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. G. Hoessel Line = papers co-authored together J. G. Hoessel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200355
2
The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XV. Implications of a Cepheid Distance to the Fornax Cluster
19981
3
The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale
19982
4 1998129
5 199851
6 199853
7 199754
8 199656
9 199619
10 199671
11 19963
12
The Palomar Distant Cluster Survey
19951
13 199551
14
The Discovery of Cepheids and a New Distance to M101 Using the Hubble Space Telescope
19942
15 19948
16 19894
17 19890
18 19862
19 19864
20 19792

About J. G. Hoessel

J. G. Hoessel is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 114 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (87 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (74 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (44 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (20 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.1k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (450 citations). J. G. Hoessel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Abhijit Saha, J. R. Mould, J. S. Gallagher, Paul A. Scowen, John T. Trauger, David Crisp, A. M. Watson, Karl Stapelfeldt, J. T. Clarke and R. E. Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and The Astrophysical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026