Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Massive molecular outflows and evidence for AGN feedback from CO observations
2014353 citationsC. Cicone, R. Maiolino et al.Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Fischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Fischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Fischer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Fischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Fischer. The network helps show where J. Fischer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Fischer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Fischer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Fischer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Fischer. J. Fischer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rothberg, Barry, J. Fischer, M. Rodrigues, & Nor Pirzkal. (2015). A Monster At Any Other Epoch: Are Intermediate Redshift ULIRGs the Progenitors of QSO Host Galaxies?. 29. 2257946.1 indexed citations
8.
Cicone, C., R. Maiolino, E. Sturm, et al.. (2014). Massive molecular outflows and evidence for AGN feedback from CO observations. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).353 indexed citations breakdown →
González-Alfonso, E., J. Fischer, J. Graciá‐Carpio, et al.. (2013). The Mrk 231 molecular outflow as seen in OH. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).41 indexed citations
Klaassen, T.O., et al.. (2004). THz calorimetry: An absolute power meter for TeraHertz radiation and the absorptivity of the Herschel Space Observatory telescope mirror coating. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
13.
Dudley, C. C. & J. Fischer. (2004). Supernova 2004C in NGC 3683. IAUC. 57. 1.1 indexed citations
Spinoglio, L., M. Benedettini, G. De Troia, et al.. (2000). ISO spectroscopy of Seyfert galaxies: fine structure line diagnostics in seven galaxies. ESASP. 456. 261.1 indexed citations
16.
Bradford, C. M., et al.. (1999). Far-infrared spectroscopic images of M83. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
17.
Fischer, J., S. D. Lord, S. J. Unger, et al.. (1999). An LWS spectroscopic survey of infrared bright galaxies. ESASP. 427. 817.1 indexed citations
18.
Satyapal, Shobita, M. L. Luhman, J. Fischer, et al.. (1999). Far-infrared spectroscopy and near-infrared imaging of Mrk 231. ESASP. 427. 889.1 indexed citations
19.
Bradford, C. M., G. J. Stacey, J. Fischer, et al.. (1999). ISO spectroscopy of OH in the starburst galaxy NGC 253. 427. 861.1 indexed citations
20.
Spinoglio, L., M. A. Malkan, P. E. Clegg, et al.. (1997). The ISO LWS spectrum of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068. 427. 333.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.