J. Droulez
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 5
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 3
- Motor Control and Adaptation 1
- Co-authors
- Alain Berthoz (5 shared papers)Pierre Denise (3 shared papers)C. Darlot (3 shared papers)Bernard Cohen (2 shared papers)A. Buizza (1 shared paper)R. Schmid (1 shared paper)Alain Berthoz (1 shared paper)J.-J.E. Slotine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Brain Research (4 papers)Biological Cybernetics (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
J. Droulez
7 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Neurology 198
- Cognitive Neuroscience 271
- Ophthalmology 47
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 83
- Human-Computer Interaction 25
Countries citing papers authored by J. Droulez
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Droulez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Droulez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Droulez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Droulez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Droulez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Droulez. The network helps show where J. Droulez may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside J. Droulez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 112 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 19 |
About J. Droulez
J. Droulez is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper), Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper) and Motor Control and Adaptation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (198 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (271 citations), Ophthalmology (47 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (83 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations). J. Droulez has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alain Berthoz, Pierre Denise, C. Darlot, Bernard Cohen, A. Buizza, R. Schmid, Alain Berthoz, J.-J.E. Slotine, Sylvain Hanneton and Pierre Paul Vidal. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Biological Cybernetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.