J. de Pommery
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- D. MenétreyMichel Lantéri‐MinetD. RichéJean‐François MichielsFrançois RoudierJ. Weil-FugazzaM. ThomassetK.G. Baimbridge
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
J. de Pommery
23 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 655
- Physiology 652
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 357
- Cognitive Neuroscience 237
- Molecular Biology 196
Countries citing papers authored by J. de Pommery
This map shows the geographic impact of J. de Pommery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. de Pommery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. de Pommery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. de Pommery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. de Pommery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. de Pommery. The network helps show where J. de Pommery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. de Pommery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. de Pommery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. de Pommery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. de Pommery. J. de Pommery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 122 | |
| 4 | [Favourable effect of zolpidem on catatonia]. | 17 |
| 5 | Dramatic improvement of catatonia with zolpidem | 6 |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | 133 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 123 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 203 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 112 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About J. de Pommery
J. de Pommery is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (357 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (655 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (116 citations). J. de Pommery has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Menétrey, Michel Lantéri‐Minet, D. Riché, Jean‐François Michiels, François Roudier, J. Weil-Fugazza, M. Thomasset, K.G. Baimbridge, Jean‐Marie Besson and Luis Villanueva. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.