J. D. Trout
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 15
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Co-authors
- Michaël BishopJames W. McAllisterPaul K. MoserWilliam J. PoserRichard M. BurianJ. R. NewbroughPaul R. DokeckiJanice Nadler
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (5 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Philosophy Compass (2 papers)Noûs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. D. Trout
34 papers receiving 672 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- History and Philosophy of Science 302
- General Decision Sciences 44
- Philosophy 240
- General Psychology 20
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
Countries citing papers authored by J. D. Trout
This map shows the geographic impact of J. D. Trout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. D. Trout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. D. Trout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. D. Trout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. D. Trout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. D. Trout. The network helps show where J. D. Trout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside J. D. Trout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 4 | A Restriction Maybe, But is it Paternalism? Cognitive Bias and Choosing Governmental Decision Aids | 2009 | 2 |
| 5 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 13 | Solving coyote problems | 2001 | 0 |
| 14 | 2001 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 104 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 3 |
About J. D. Trout
J. D. Trout is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Family Practice, General Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (302 citations), General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Philosophy (240 citations), General Psychology (20 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations). J. D. Trout has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Bishop, James W. McAllister, Paul K. Moser, William J. Poser, Richard M. Burian, J. R. Newbrough, Paul R. Dokecki, Janice Nadler, Hongjie Hu and William J. Gambogi. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Philosophy Compass and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.