This map shows the geographic impact of J. Cepa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Cepa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Cepa more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Cepa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Cepa. The network helps show where J. Cepa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Cepa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Cepa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Cepa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Cepa. J. Cepa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bongiovanni, Á., A. M. Pérez García, J. Cepa, et al.. (2019). The OTELO survey II. The faint-end of the Hα luminosity function at z ∼ 0.40. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).6 indexed citations
Castro‐Tirado, A. J., R. Sánchez-Ramírez, J. Gorosabel, et al.. (2013). GRB 130606A: 10.4m GTC refined redshift z = 5.91.. GRB Coordinates Network. 14796. 1.1 indexed citations
Sánchez‐Portal, M., Irene Pintos-Castro, R. Pérez‐Martínez, et al.. (2013). THE GALAXY CLUSTER EVOLUTION SURVEY (GLACE): OVERVIEW AND STATUS REPORT. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 42. 44–46.1 indexed citations
Gorosabel, J., A. J. Castro‐Tirado, A. de Ugarte Postigo, et al.. (2010). GRB 100816A: 10.4-m GTC redshift confirmation.. GCN. 11125. 1.2 indexed citations
10.
Castro‐Tirado, A. J., A. de Ugarte Postigo, J. Gorosabel, et al.. (2009). GRB 090709A: deep optical observation with the 10.4m GTC.. GRB Coordinates Network. 9655. 1.1 indexed citations
11.
Cepa, J.. (2009). The emission-line universe : XVIII Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
12.
González‐Serrano, J. I., et al.. (2006). OSIRIS Mask Designer for Multi-Object Spectroscopy. ASPC. 351. 351.1 indexed citations
13.
Poglitsch, A., Christoffel Waelkens, N. Geis, et al.. (2005). The Herschel Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer PACS. Astronomische Nachrichten. 326. 583–583.1 indexed citations
14.
González‐Serrano, J. I., J. Cepa, J. Gallego, et al.. (2005). QSOs and the survey otelo. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 24. 245–246.1 indexed citations
Alfaro, E. J., J. Cepa, J. Gallego, et al.. (2003). GALACTIC ASTRONOMY WITH OTELO. 16. 255–256.1 indexed citations
17.
Cepa, J., Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, H. O. Castañeda, et al.. (2003). OSIRIS TUNABLE IMAGER AND SPECTROGRAPH: INSTRUMENT STATUS. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 16. 13–18.1 indexed citations
18.
Cepa, J., J. I. González‐Serrano, E. Joven, et al.. (2000). OSIRIS tunable imager and spectrograph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4008. 623–623.85 indexed citations
19.
Kidger, M., J. N. González‐Pérez, J. A. de Diego, et al.. (1995). A large optical and infrared outburst in OJ 287.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 113. 431.1 indexed citations
20.
Beckman, J. E., J. Cepa, M. Prieto, & C. Muñoz–Tuñón. (1987). Ngc 2403 : a flocculent galaxy with two principal centres of star formation. 14(1). 134–143.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.