Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mesoscale to Submesoscale Transition in the California Current System. Part I: Flow Structure, Eddy Flux, and Observational Tests
2008578 citationsXavier Capet, J. C. McWilliams et al.Journal of Physical Oceanographyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. C. McWilliams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. McWilliams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. McWilliams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. McWilliams. The network helps show where J. C. McWilliams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. McWilliams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. McWilliams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. McWilliams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. McWilliams. J. C. McWilliams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fovell, Robert G., K. N. Liou, J. C. McWilliams, et al.. (2009). A PROJECTION OF THE COLD SEASON HYDROCLIMATE IN CALIFORNIA IN MID- TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY UNDER THE SRES-A1B EMISSION SCENARIO.2 indexed citations
2.
Mitarai, Satoshi, David A. Siegel, James R. Watson, Can Dong, & J. C. McWilliams. (2008). Quantifying Connectivity in the Coastal Ocean. AGUFM. 2008.4 indexed citations
3.
Capet, Xavier, J. C. McWilliams, M. Jeroen Molemaker, & Alexander F. Shchepetkin. (2008). Mesoscale to Submesoscale Transition in the California Current System. Part I: Flow Structure, Eddy Flux, and Observational Tests. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 38(1). 29–43.578 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Hardenberg, Jost von, J. C. McWilliams, Antonello Provenzale, Alexander F. Shchepetkin, & Jeffrey B. Weiss. (2000). Vortex merging in quasi-geostrophic flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 412. 331–353.54 indexed citations
Kinney, Rodney & J. C. McWilliams. (1998). Turbulent cascades in anisotropic magnetohydrodynamics. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 57(6). 7111–7121.54 indexed citations
McWilliams, J. C.. (1975). Analysis of solar radiation measurements at Valentia Observatory for the 11-year period 1964-1974. Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin).1 indexed citations
McWilliams, J. C. & Jude Byrne. (1951). Averages in rainfall for stations in Ireland 1916-1950. Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.