Ivano Condò
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Papers in
- Aging 2
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 2
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 17
- Co-authors
- Roberto TestiAlessandra RufiniFlorence MalisanNatascia VenturaBarbara TomassiniDaniela BariláMaria Rita RippoGiulio Superti‐Furga
- Journals
- Human Molecular Genetics (6 papers)Molecular Microbiology (2 papers)Blood (2 papers)Frontiers in Neuroscience (2 papers)Cell Death and Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Ivano Condò
30 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Aging 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 414
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cell Biology 250
- Biological Psychiatry 25
Countries citing papers authored by Ivano Condò
This map shows the geographic impact of Ivano Condò's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivano Condò with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivano Condò more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ivano Condò
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivano Condò. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivano Condò. The network helps show where Ivano Condò may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ivano Condò, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 97 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 75 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 159 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 66 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 13 |
About Ivano Condò
Ivano Condò is a scholar working on Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (17 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (15 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (6 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (5 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (75 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (414 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Cell Biology (250 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (25 citations). Ivano Condò has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roberto Testi, Alessandra Rufini, Florence Malisan, Natascia Ventura, Barbara Tomassini, Daniela Barilá, Maria Rita Rippo, Giulio Superti‐Furga, Silvia Fortuni and Davide Ruggero. Their work appears in journals such as Human Molecular Genetics, Molecular Microbiology, Blood, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Cell Death and Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.