Ivan Cabrilo

32 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Ivan Cabrilo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 171
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
  • Neurology 76
  • Surgery 212
  • Human-Computer Interaction 28
Replace Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen with:
Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen Netherlands
Hugo Miguel Pereira Choupina Portugal
Karen Otte Germany
Andrew K. C. Lam Hong Kong
Arnaud Jean-Pierre Edouard Vincent Netherlands
Patrick J. H. de Koning Netherlands
Omid Moshtaghi United States
Emi Zuiki Murano United States
Nusrat Choudhury Canada
Florian Grimm Germany
Ivan Cabrilo relative to Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen Netherlands Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Cabrilo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Cabrilo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Cabrilo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Cabrilo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Cabrilo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Cabrilo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Cabrilo. The network helps show where Ivan Cabrilo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ivan Cabrilo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan Cabrilo Line = papers co-authored together Ivan Cabrilo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014109
2 201494
3 201577
4 201475
5 201457
6 201847
7 201529
8 201423
9 202122
10 201510
11 202110
12 20239
13 20157
14 20207
15 20217
16 20237
17 20206
18 20216
19 20125
20 20135

About Ivan Cabrilo

Ivan Cabrilo is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Rheumatology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers) and Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (171 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations), Neurology (76 citations), Surgery (212 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (28 citations). Ivan Cabrilo has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl Schaller, Philippe Bijlenga, A. S. Sarrafzadeh, Bruno Herbelin, Roberta Ronchi, Basile Nicolas Landis, Marta Łukowska, Colette Boëx, Olaf Blanke and Javier Bello‐Ruiz. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neurochirurgica, Journal of Clinical Medicine, World Neurosurgery, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery and European Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact