Isamu Sando

179 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Isamu Sando
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.7k
  • Sensory Systems 1.4k
  • Neurology 1.3k
  • Genetics 425
  • Neurology 518
Replace Paul R. Lambert with:
Paul R. Lambert United States
Patricia A. Schachern United States
Toshimitsu Kobayashi Japan
Richard R. Gacek United States
P.L.M. Huygen Netherlands
Harold F. Schuknecht United States
H. F. Schuknecht United States
Fred H. Linthicum United States
Thomas Somers Belgium
Kiyofumi Gyo Japan
Isamu Sando relative to Paul R. Lambert United States Paul R. Lambert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Paul R. Lambert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Isamu Sando

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isamu Sando's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isamu Sando with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isamu Sando more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Isamu Sando

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isamu Sando. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isamu Sando. The network helps show where Isamu Sando may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Isamu Sando, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Isamu Sando Line = papers co-authored together Isamu Sando links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 185 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987184
2 1965162
3 1991127
4 1989110
5 198482
6 198675
7 198475
8 197370
9 196470
10 197960
11
Localization of function in the eustachian tube: a hypothesis.
199459
12 198456
13 198855
14 199152
15 199751
16 199248
17 198145
18 198245
19 197745
20 197445

About Isamu Sando

Isamu Sando is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Oncology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 185 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (104 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (62 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (48 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (35 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (32 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (25 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (25 papers) and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (1.7k citations), Sensory Systems (1.4k citations), Neurology (1.3k citations), Genetics (425 citations) and Neurology (518 citations). Isamu Sando has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Haruo Takahashi, Akira Takagi, Minoru Ikeda, William G. Hemenway, Taeko Okuno, Tetsuo Takahara, Shoji Matsune, Haruo Takahashi, Makoto Miura and LaVonne Bergstrom. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, The Laryngoscope, Otolaryngology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact