Irwin Goodwin

425 citations
169 papers · 331 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Irwin Goodwin

137 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Irwin Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 73
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 29
  • Condensed Matter Physics 25
Replace John S. Rigden with:
John S. Rigden United States
O. R. Frisch United Kingdom
Gloria B. Lubkin United States
Joan Lisa Bromberg United States
Kurt Hübner Switzerland
David Wright United States
William A. Blanpied United States
Friedel Weinert United Kingdom
H. B. G. Casimir Netherlands
Harry Paul Germany
Irwin Goodwin relative to John S. Rigden United States John S. Rigden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
John S. Rigden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Irwin Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irwin Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irwin Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irwin Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irwin Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irwin Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irwin Goodwin. The network helps show where Irwin Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Irwin Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Irwin Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Irwin Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199937
2 198718
3 198412
4 19909
5 19917
6 19936
7 19836
8 19926
9 19986
10 19945
11 19975
12 19904
13 20004
14 19854
15 19914
16 19984
17 19954
18 19973
19 19853
20 19893

About Irwin Goodwin

Irwin Goodwin is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Management, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Reproductive Medicine and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 169 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space exploration and regulation (11 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (9 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (8 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (6 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (6 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (3 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (73 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (29 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (25 citations). Irwin Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard N. Zare, Daniel Kleppner, Albert Libchaber, Bertram Schwarzschild, Denis F. Cioffi, Ralph E. Gomory, Gloria B. Lubkin, D. A. Bromley, Walter E. Massey and Siegfried S. Hecker. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, Nature and The Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact