Irene Visser
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Helen Wilcox
- Topics
- Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers)South African History and Culture (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaWomen s Studies International ForumJournal of Gender Studies
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIreland
In The Last Decade
Irene Visser
13 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
- Clinical Psychology 32
- Social Psychology 31
- Gender Studies 27
Countries citing papers authored by Irene Visser
This map shows the geographic impact of Irene Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irene Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irene Visser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irene Visser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irene Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irene Visser. The network helps show where Irene Visser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irene Visser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irene Visser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irene Visser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irene Visser. Irene Visser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Entanglements of Trauma: Relationality and Toni Morrison's Home | 12 |
| 6 | Trauma Theory: Global Aspirations and Local Emendations | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | Transforming Holiness: Representations of Holiness in English and American Literary Texts | 0 |
| 11 | Family Fictions: The Family in Contemporary Postcolonial Literatures in English | 2 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | American women writers in the Dutch literary world 1824-1900 | 1 |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | Post-war literatures in English | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Irene Visser
Irene Visser is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Gender Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and South African History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (92 citations). Irene Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Wilcox. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Women s Studies International Forum and Journal of Gender Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.