In‐Tae Kim

1.5k citations
96 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

In‐Tae Kim

84 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

In‐Tae Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Metals and Alloys 49
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 353
  • Materials Chemistry 632
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 248
  • Mechanics of Materials 212
Replace Giampiero Montesperelli with:
Giampiero Montesperelli Italy
Ulf Bexell Sweden
A. Abdel Aal Egypt
Akihiro Yabuki Japan
Maryory Astrid Gómez Botero Colombia
Peter Skeldon United Kingdom
Antonello Vicenzo Italy
R.V. Lakshmi India
Wenge Li China
Yongzhe Fan China
In‐Tae Kim relative to Giampiero Montesperelli Italy Giampiero Montesperelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Giampiero Montesperelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In‐Tae Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In‐Tae Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In‐Tae Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In‐Tae Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In‐Tae Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In‐Tae Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In‐Tae Kim. The network helps show where In‐Tae Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In‐Tae Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In‐Tae Kim Line = papers co-authored together In‐Tae Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994122
2 1996116
3 199562
4 199657
5 201552
6 201543
7 201942
8 201740
9 201734
10 201533
11 201831
12 201831
13 201129
14 201028
15 201925
16 201625
17 201523
18 201823
19 201722
20 201120

About In‐Tae Kim

In‐Tae Kim is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Concrete Corrosion and Durability (22 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (20 papers), Structural Load-Bearing Analysis (19 papers), Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (18 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (12 papers), Engineering Applied Research (10 papers), Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (7 papers) and Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (49 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (353 citations), Materials Chemistry (632 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (248 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (212 citations). In‐Tae Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Japan and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Kug Sun Hong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Young-Soo Jeong, Nobuko Yoshimoto, Masayuki Morita, Jungwon Huh, Duy Khiem Nguyen, Makoto Egashira, Jae Min Lee and Heesoo Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Engineering Failure Analysis, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Materials and Journal of Power Sources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact