Countries where authors publish in Engineering Failure Analysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Engineering Failure Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Failure Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis.
About Engineering Failure Analysis
The 9.1k papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 160.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis usually cover Metals and Alloys (1.2k papers), Mechanics of Materials (3.9k papers) and Mechanical Engineering (5.3k papers) specifically the topics of Fatigue and fracture mechanics (1.6k papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (1.2k papers), Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation (1.0k papers), Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (882 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (761 papers), High Temperature Alloys and Creep (679 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (554 papers) and Concrete Corrosion and Durability (503 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Engineering Failure Analysis are C.R.F. Azevedo, Colin Gagg, Marco Valente, Gabriele Milani, Lucjan Witek, Yimin Shao, Ricardo Manuel Arias Velásquez, Zaigang Chen, Anand Parey and Hui Ma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.